Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—2d Cir.: High school teachers, ordered to remove LGBTQ+ pride decorations, lose on appeal
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM tells agencies to expand AI use in federal hiring
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—4th Cir.: Sales administrator’s religious discrimination claim over COVID vax mandate revived
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—E.D. Mich.: Termination timing, unexplained RIF decision defeat employer’s motion for summary judgment
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New H-2A adverse effect wage rates up in air as court orders DOL to try again: what agricultural employers need to know
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Wake-up call: L.A. County's hotel worker protection ordinance is in effect
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—DOJ joins federal trucking crackdown, intensifying scrutiny of driver training and hiring practices
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Marine lieutenant colonel challenges transgender service ban, alleges forced retirement would cost rank and benefits
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • NLRB NEWS—Advice says firing of Microsoft employees who spearheaded Gaza protest on company grounds did not violate Section 8(a)(1)
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PRIVACY, COMPUTER FRAUD—E.D. Mo.: Authorized access and insufficient trade-secret allegations doom Teamwear's federal claims
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PROCEDURE—Fed. Cir.: Jurisdiction lacking in appeal from denial of sanctions in discrimination, non-discrimination suit
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—SEX—E.D. Cal.: Walmart manager’s gender, heritage bias and retaliation claims advance to trial
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—D. Del.: Disputed facts precluded summary judgment as to police captains’ possible overtime exemption
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, NLRB NEWS—Advice says firing of Microsoft employees who spearheaded Gaza protest on company grounds did not violate Section 8(a)(1), (Sep 1, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:Home Depot | Microsoft | Microsoft Corporation

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “Here, the protest’s objectives were to pressure the Employer to cut ties with the Israeli government, raise awareness of conditions in Gaza, and raise funds for humanitarian relief—not to improve employees’ working condit ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use