Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • RETALIATION—2d. Cir.: Former Louis Vuitton counsel’s refusal to meet with supervisor to discuss settlement was protected activity
    • AI NEWS—Maryland governor announces his administration’s AI framework
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—D. Idaho: Seventy-year-old bookkeeper fends off summary judgment amid disputed discharge reasons
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—D. Colo.: Hospital prevails in disability discrimination suit of physician with work-related burnout
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—S.D. Ohio: Black nurse’s bias, retaliation claims over non-selection for an APP position advance to trial
    • EMPLOYEE STATUS—W.D. Okla.: Franchisees for janitorial service determined to be ‘employees’ under FLSA
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DHS Proposes Eliminating 60-Day Grace Period for Certain Nonimmigrant Workers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Just Like Clockwork—Here's Your Annual Reminder That the California Minimum Wage Increase Is Not Just for Hourly Employees
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—DoorDash announces it will pay $131.5M for underpaying delivery workers, including $16.7M in fines to NYC
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Union sues Pennsylvania over state labor law’s carveout for agricultural workers
    • NAA CORNER—Insubordination: insolence in all its guises
    • PROCEDURE—1st Cir.: Police officer, placed on leave after reinstatement, failed to preserve that issue
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—N.D. Cal.: Lone plaintiff theory grounded in securities fraud may proceed
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Just Like Clockwork—Here's Your Annual Reminder That the California Minimum Wage Increase Is Not Just for Hourly Employees, (Sep 22, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Greenberg Glusker

    By Wendy Lane of Greenberg Glusker LLP

    While it’s difficult to think about winter and the new year as we swelter through our hottest weeks of the year, the approach of Q4 means that California employers are budgeting for 2027. In case you missed it, the California Department of Ind ...

    By Wendy Lane of Greenberg Glusker LLP

    While it’s difficult to think about winter and the new year as we swelter through our hottest weeks of the year, the approach of Q4 means that California employers are budgeting for 2027. In case you missed it, the California Department of Industrial Relations has already announced that, effective January 1, 2027, the current minimum wage of $16.90 per hour is increasing to $17.40 per hour. And, as we remind our readers every year, the hourly minimum wage increase doesn’t just affect hourly employees’ rate of pay. It also increases the salary-basis test for California’s executive, administrative, and professional overtime exemption categories.

    For these exemptions from overtime to apply to salaried employees, California employers must pay a salary that is at least twice the state minimum wage (in addition to meeting the other duties requirements for those exempt classifications). Therefore, in order to remain exempt, salaried employees must receive no less than $72,384 per year (which is $1,392 per week or $6,032 per month) beginning January 1, 2027. (This is an increase from the 2026 minimum exempt salary of $1,352.00/week, $5,858.67/month, or $70,304.00 annually.)

    The minimum salary requirement is unforgiving. If an employee receives less than the minimum exempt salary in any pay period, they automatically become non-exempt during that pay period and they become eligible for overtime pay, even if their job duties fully qualify as executive, administrative, or professional.

    As a reminder, although there are as many cities and counties in California with their own minimum wage requirements as there are new Starbucks fall beverage flavors, local minimum wages do not affect the minimum salary threshold for exempt employees, as that is affected solely by the state minimum wage. Nevertheless, employers should monitor local requirements as the local minimum wages for hourly employees generally exceed the state minimum wage.

    Finally, employers with out-of-state employees should note that federal regulations require employees to be paid a minimum salary of $35,568.00, or $684.00/week, to qualify as exempt under the executive, administrative, or professional employee exemptions. Employees outside of California who are exempt under the federal Highly Compensated Employees rule must earn $107,432.00/year, including at least $684.00/week paid on a salary or fee basis.

    Wendy Lane

    Greenberg Glusker LLP

    2049 Century Park East

    Suite 2600

    Los Angeles, CA 90067 United States

    Tel.: +1 310 553 3610

    E-mail: sgandhi@greenbergglusker.com

    URL: www.greenbergglusker.com/

    © Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Wendy Lane (Greenberg Glusker).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights WageHour MinimumWage Exemptions CaliforniaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use