Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL proposes national minimum job-search requirement for unemployment benefits
    • CLASS ACTIONS—D. Colo.: Justice Department cannot raise objections in meat processing wage suppression settlement final fairness hearing
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • CONFERENCES—California’s new Chief Privacy Auditor discusses office’s first formal audit, of gig economy consumer and worker data, at D.C. forum
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—10th Cir.: ADA claims, brought by EEOC on behalf of sales associate with COVID ‘symptoms,’ revived
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—D.D.C.: Race discrimination claim by fired Surface Transportation Board member dismissed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—E.D. Wis.: Gay police officer’s promotion bias lawsuit dismissed despite topping sergeant eligibility list
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—From proposal to final rule: DOL's long-awaited final PBM fee disclosure rule includes significant changes and clarifications
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Sixth Circuit logs on to the computer employee exemption: actual duties, not degrees or job titles, control
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • LABOR NEWS—Transport Workers Union blasts new Amtrak policy that will allow passengers to bring guns on passenger cars
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Ga.: Employee’s filing of signed fee agreement sufficient to satisfy FLSA’s ‘written consent’ requirement
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D. Or.: Utility worker with prostate cancer, assigned to cleaning sewers, advances several claims
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—S.D.N.Y.: $3.9 million jury verdict against employer reduced to $1 by New York federal court
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • REPORTS—Child labor enforcement procedures need strengthening, DOL watchdog says
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • USERRA, VETERANS—N.D. Ill.: Former United pilot fails to show anti-military bias drove termination decision
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, CLASS ACTIONS—D. Colo.: Justice Department cannot raise objections in meat processing wage suppression settlement final fairness hearing, (Nov 9, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP | Kasowitz LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:JBS USA Food Co.

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    The court ruled that a settlement is not prejudicial if it does not prevent later assertion of a non-settling party’s claims, even if, in this instance, the U.S. must start a second lawsuit to pursue injunctive relief.

    The United States Departm ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use