Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK NEWS—U.S.: Winemaker asks High Court to review standard for giving preclusive effect to Board decisions
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Validity of search-engine patent affirmed, Google had petitioned for inter partes review
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Retailer’s counterclaims in trademark infringement case barred by claim preclusion
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—M.D.N.C.: Judge orders expanded search for rebranding documents in CR mark dispute
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE values statement identification could not aspire to be a service mark
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: ‘CHEF VERIFIED’ mark for television show production services properly denied registration
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—TTAB: DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE values statement identification could not aspire to be a service mark, (Oct 22, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Barlow, Josephs & Holmes, Ltd.
    Organizations Mentioned:International First Committee Association

    By Justin Marcus Smith, J.D.

    The fact that the proposed mark appeared on a wall-mounted plaque typical of organizational values statements only reinforced the conclusion that the mark did not designate the source of a service and therefore could not be a service mark.

    In a nonpre ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use