Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK NEWS—U.S.: Winemaker asks High Court to review standard for giving preclusive effect to Board decisions
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Validity of search-engine patent affirmed, Google had petitioned for inter partes review
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Retailer’s counterclaims in trademark infringement case barred by claim preclusion
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—M.D.N.C.: Judge orders expanded search for rebranding documents in CR mark dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE values statement identification could not aspire to be a service mark
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: ‘CHEF VERIFIED’ mark for television show production services properly denied registration
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Validity of search-engine patent affirmed, Google had petitioned for inter partes review, (Oct 22, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Irell & Manella LLP | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC
    Organizations Mentioned:Google LLC | Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

    By Carolin Dennis, B.Sc., LL.B., LL.M.

    The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) determination that Google LLC did not demonstrate the unpatentability of claims 1 through 23 of a patent on merging search-result lists.

    In a non-precedential disp ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use