Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK NEWS—U.S.: Winemaker asks High Court to review standard for giving preclusive effect to Board decisions
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Validity of search-engine patent affirmed, Google had petitioned for inter partes review
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Retailer’s counterclaims in trademark infringement case barred by claim preclusion
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—M.D.N.C.: Judge orders expanded search for rebranding documents in CR mark dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE values statement identification could not aspire to be a service mark
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: ‘CHEF VERIFIED’ mark for television show production services properly denied registration
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—M.D.N.C.: Judge orders expanded search for rebranding documents in CR mark dispute, (Oct 22, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Dickinson Wright PLLC | Spencer Fane
    Organizations Mentioned:CR Legal Team, LLP | Carruthers & Roth, P.A.

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    CR Legal Team must search personal devices and produce additional rebranding documents in trademark litigation.

    A federal magistrate judge in North Carolina largely granted a motion to compel in a trademark dispute involving competing "CR" marks, orde ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use