Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK NEWS—U.S.: Winemaker asks High Court to review standard for giving preclusive effect to Board decisions
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Validity of search-engine patent affirmed, Google had petitioned for inter partes review
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Retailer’s counterclaims in trademark infringement case barred by claim preclusion
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—M.D.N.C.: Judge orders expanded search for rebranding documents in CR mark dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE values statement identification could not aspire to be a service mark
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: ‘CHEF VERIFIED’ mark for television show production services properly denied registration
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Retailer’s counterclaims in trademark infringement case barred by claim preclusion, (Oct 22, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Axenfeld Law Group, LLC | The Mchattie Law Firm
    Organizations Mentioned:Kalustyan Corp. | Marhaba International, Inc.

    By Steven D. Cole, J.D.

    All but one of the counterclaims were, or could have been, litigated in a prior action, resulting in their dismissal.

    A federal district court in New Jersey held, in what it termed a “spice saga” that “hearkens back to 1944,ȁ ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use