Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • IMMIGRATION—U.S.: Justices allow terminations of TPS for Syria and Haiti to go into effect
    • AGENCY NEWS—FCC Chairman defends stance against ‘discriminatory’ DEI practices
    • DISCHARGE—7th Cir.: Fired transgender Chicago bus operator failed to establish sex discrimination, FMLA violations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—7th Cir.: City not required to grant in-place promotion to firefighter who had suffered a stoke
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—8th Cir.: Judgment for USDA affirmed in disability bias suit brought by abused spouse
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—Accounting professor’s pregnancy discrimination verdict affirmed on appeal in Michigan Tech case
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—4th Cir.: State police supervisor not entitled to qualified immunity in race-based hostile work environment suit
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—9th Cir.: Flight attendants fired after commenting on Equality Act revive religious bias claims
    • EMPLOYEE STATUS—N.D. Ill.: Chicago news rivals split wins in bitter copyright showdown
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Court Finds Streamers are Employees Under New Jersey Law Despite Independent Contractor Status Under the FLSA
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—The New ‘ABCs’: NJDOL Adopts New Rules on Worker Classification
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—Bicameral legislation would restrict surveillance of employees
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—VA proposes eliminating disparate-impact liability regs under Title VI
    • LABOR PULSE—The more things change, the more they remain the same? Two encyclicals, 155 years, same naivete
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—The House Takes a bite of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; Does the Senate have the same appetite?
    • PROCEDURE—4th Cir.: South Carolina’s ‘pre-enforcement, facial challenge’ to OSHA rule was brought too late
    • RETALIATION—3d Cir.: Relaxed standard for Title VII retaliation claims applies to ADA, FMLA claims
    • TRADE SECRETS—N.D. Ohio: Preliminary injunction denied in industrial gas turbine airfoils trade secrets dispute
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, ON THE LABOR FRONT—The House Takes a bite of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; Does the Senate have the same appetite?, (Jun 25, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:U.S. House of Representatives

    By Michael J. Soltis

    The FLCA guarantees there will be a first contract and imposes a maximum time to reach that agreement by establishing a fast track with specific deadlines.

    On June 9, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (FLCA) ...

    By Michael J. Soltis

    The FLCA guarantees there will be a first contract and imposes a maximum time to reach that agreement by establishing a fast track with specific deadlines.

    On June 9, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (FLCA), a standalone version of a provision of the proposed PRO Act. The bill briefly states its purpose is “to accelerate the time-to-contract under the National Labor Relations Act” (NLRA). A more appropriate statement might be “to allow arbitrators to impose terms of a first contract under the NLRA if the parties do not reach agreement after three months of bargaining and an additional month of mediation.” Will the Senate take this bite of the PRO Act as well.?

    The FLCA purports to be the solution to the fact that negotiating an initial labor contract often takes significant time, sometimes more than a year, and that sometimes the parties never reach agreement.

    If enacted, the FLCA would revise the fundamental structure of the NLRA for employers negotiating an initial contract. For a discussion on whether the Senate will approve the House’s action on the FLCA, see Mike Soltis’ latest On the Labor Front article: The House Takes a Bite of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; Does the Senate Have the Same Appetite?

    MainStory: LaborNews Labor Procedure FederalLegislation AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use