Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • RETALIATION—6th Cir.: Rehab Act Sec. 504 does not provide private right of action for retaliation
    • AGENCY NEWS—Members of Congress request agency information on employer-driven debt agreements
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM advises on liability for performance management, noting concerns have been expressed
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM announces governmentwide study of agency efforts regarding DEI and return-to-work
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—E.D. Mo.: Technology company obtains narrow preliminary injunction against former employee
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—2d Cir.: Telecom manager, fired after losing large accounts, could not establish FMLA violation
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—California enacts new employment laws for 2026
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Pennsylvania Governor signs new CROWN Act, protecting certain hairstyles and head coverings
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—6th Cir.: Law firm, but not Nashville councilman, was immune from fired lawyer’s suit
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—NYAG Letitia James’s recent wins include successful challenge to dismantling of four federal agencies
    • MSPB NEWS—Board issues first precedential decision since March
    • OFCCP NEWS—Federal contract value thresholds for Section 503, VEVRAA compliance have increased
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—9th Cir.: District court’s finding employer willfully made over-deductions from employee pay for benefit fund premature
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—2d Cir.: Contributing-factor causation standard applies to FRSA whistleblower claims
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, OFCCP NEWS—Federal contract value thresholds for Section 503, VEVRAA compliance have increased, (Dec 1, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council | Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The OFCCP explained that the threshold increases are the result of required inflationary adjustments.

    The jurisdictional thresholds for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act have increas ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The OFCCP explained that the threshold increases are the result of required inflationary adjustments.

    The jurisdictional thresholds for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act have increased, according to a release from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). The increases took effect October 1, 2025.

    Threshold increases. According to the OFCCP, the basic coverage threshold for Section 503, which applies to contractors or subcontractors with any number of employees, increased from $15,000 to $20,000. Under Section 503, a business that has a federal construction contract and that meets the updated basic threshold is required to treat qualified individuals with disabilities without discrimination on the basis of their physical or mental disability in all employment practices and to take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities. A business with at least 50 employees and single contract of $50,000 or more must also develop a Section 503 AAP.

    Under VEVRAA, a business with a federal construction contract of $200,000 or more is required to treat qualified individuals without discrimination in all employment practices, based on the worker’s status as a protected veteran. If a business with a single federal construction contract of $200,000 or more and at least 50 employees must also develop a VEVRAA AAP.

    Inflationary adjustments. The threshold increases resulted from an inflationary adjustment statute authorizing the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council) to review and adjust “acquisition-related” threshold amounts in statutes applying to federal procurement. The FAR Council is required to review the dollar threshold amounts in certain federal agency procurement-related laws every five years to determine whether adjustments are needed due to inflation.

    News: AgencyNews LaborNews Labor Discrimination DisabilityDiscrimination CoverageLiability

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use