Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • RETALIATION—6th Cir.: Rehab Act Sec. 504 does not provide private right of action for retaliation
    • AGENCY NEWS—Members of Congress request agency information on employer-driven debt agreements
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM advises on liability for performance management, noting concerns have been expressed
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM announces governmentwide study of agency efforts regarding DEI and return-to-work
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—E.D. Mo.: Technology company obtains narrow preliminary injunction against former employee
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—2d Cir.: Telecom manager, fired after losing large accounts, could not establish FMLA violation
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—California enacts new employment laws for 2026
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Pennsylvania Governor signs new CROWN Act, protecting certain hairstyles and head coverings
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—6th Cir.: Law firm, but not Nashville councilman, was immune from fired lawyer’s suit
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—NYAG Letitia James’s recent wins include successful challenge to dismantling of four federal agencies
    • MSPB NEWS—Board issues first precedential decision since March
    • OFCCP NEWS—Federal contract value thresholds for Section 503, VEVRAA compliance have increased
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—9th Cir.: District court’s finding employer willfully made over-deductions from employee pay for benefit fund premature
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—2d Cir.: Contributing-factor causation standard applies to FRSA whistleblower claims
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—NYAG Letitia James’s recent wins include successful challenge to dismantling of four federal agencies, (Dec 1, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Minority Business Development Agency

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    A federal district court granted summary judgment to the coalition of state attorneys general who challenged the dismantling of the FMCS, among other agencies.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James announced before the holiday that a coalition of ov ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    A federal district court granted summary judgment to the coalition of state attorneys general who challenged the dismantling of the FMCS, among other agencies.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James announced before the holiday that a coalition of over 20 state attorneys general, of which she is part, succeeded in obtaining a summary judgment victory in their challenge to the dismantling of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA), and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH). Notably, the FMCS promotes peaceful resolution of labor disputes. In an order issued by a federal district court in Rhode Island, that court determined that the Executive Branch could not dismantle these federal agencies in circumvention of the will of the Legislative Branch.

    Dismantling four agencies. The states challenged the legality of Executive Order 14238, “Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy” (“Reduction EO”), which had the effect of dismantling the IMLS, MBDA, FMCS, and USICH “by withholding already-appropriated federal funding from these agencies, terminating numerous grants and programs that these agencies administer, and placing many of the agencies’ employees on administrative leave.” The court had previously issued a preliminary injunction barring the administration from implementing the EO and notes that the First Circuit denied the administration’s request for a stay pending appeal.

    Permanent injunction. On summary judgment, the states argued that implementation of the Reduction EO violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Separation of Powers doctrine, and the Take Clare Clause of the United States Constitution. The court granted the states’ motion and issued a permanent injunction, permanently enjoining the government “from taking any future actions to implement, give effect to, comply with, or carry out” the directives contained in the Reduction EO with respect to IMLS, MBDA, FMCS, and USICH.

    “The federal government’s illegal attack on these agencies threatened vital resources for workers, small businesses, and the most vulnerable in our communities,” said Attorney General James. “This is a major victory in our ongoing work to defend important services that New Yorkers rely on every day. I will keep fighting to stop the chaos and destruction of this administration’s attempts to dismantle our government.”

    The case is No. 1:25-cv-00128-JJM-AEM.

    News: LitigationNewsTrends AgencyNews PublicEmployees WhiteHouseNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use