Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • RETALIATION—6th Cir.: Rehab Act Sec. 504 does not provide private right of action for retaliation
    • AGENCY NEWS—Members of Congress request agency information on employer-driven debt agreements
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM advises on liability for performance management, noting concerns have been expressed
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM announces governmentwide study of agency efforts regarding DEI and return-to-work
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—E.D. Mo.: Technology company obtains narrow preliminary injunction against former employee
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—2d Cir.: Telecom manager, fired after losing large accounts, could not establish FMLA violation
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—California enacts new employment laws for 2026
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Pennsylvania Governor signs new CROWN Act, protecting certain hairstyles and head coverings
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—6th Cir.: Law firm, but not Nashville councilman, was immune from fired lawyer’s suit
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—NYAG Letitia James’s recent wins include successful challenge to dismantling of four federal agencies
    • MSPB NEWS—Board issues first precedential decision since March
    • OFCCP NEWS—Federal contract value thresholds for Section 503, VEVRAA compliance have increased
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—9th Cir.: District court’s finding employer willfully made over-deductions from employee pay for benefit fund premature
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—2d Cir.: Contributing-factor causation standard applies to FRSA whistleblower claims
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, MSPB NEWS—Board issues first precedential decision since March, (Dec 1, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In it, the two Board members consider an employee’s Fifth Amendment challenge to her removal for disciplinary reasons.

    In an administrative appeal heard by Vice Chairman Henry J. Kerner and Member James J. Woodruff II of the Merit Systems Prote ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In it, the two Board members consider an employee’s Fifth Amendment challenge to her removal for disciplinary reasons.

    In an administrative appeal heard by Vice Chairman Henry J. Kerner and Member James J. Woodruff II of the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Board issued its first precedential decision since March 2025.

    No warning. The appeal involves an IRS employee who was removed from her job as a result of events surrounding a virtual performance review meeting, in which the employer alleges a third party was present. The employee contends on appeal that the agency failed to provide her with a Kalkines warning, which is a procedural protection based on the Fifth Amendment that requires notification to an employee of her rights during a civil disciplinary inquiry regarding the potential consequences and possible criminal liability related to any failure to cooperate with such an inquiry.

    The members found that the IRS employee “did not have a reasonable belief that the agency’s inquiry regarding the identity of a third party would implicate her Fifth Amendment rights, such that she would be entitled to a Kalkines warning.” As such, it found that the agency’s misconduct charge was properly brought.

    News: AgencyNews IndividualRights PublicEmployees

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use