Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—9th Cir.: White employee revives hostile work environment claim tied to racial justice training
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—7th Cir.: Hospital pharmacist, fired after refusing COVID vaccine, failed to show religious discrimination
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—N.D. Ga.: Lesbian employee’s challenge to fertility benefits plan failed under Bostock
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuits focus on disability discrimination, unlawful medical exams, discriminatory qualification standards
    • EMPLOYEE LEAVE—N.D. Ga.: Employee advances FMLA, but not discrimination, claims where he was fired in RIF during leave
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Beyond the Band-Aid: California overhauls employers' first aid obligations
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New California law adds anti-hate speech training requirement for employers: what to know + 4 steps to take now
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—USCIS announces final rule revising EB-5 fees, other provisions
    • LOCAL LEGISLATION—CALIFORNIA—Lawmakers pass legislation preventing use of force majeure provision for labor disputes by waste service providers
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—NLRB preemption challenges to novel state labor laws: How have states fared in rebuffing those challenges?
    • RETALIATION—D.S.C.: Physician’s retaliation suit against Shriners Hospital can proceed
    • RETALIATION—N.D. Ohio: Worker fired after making threats in response to alleged groping advances retaliation claims
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—S.D. Ohio: Court denies summary judgment regarding overtime claim as to technical consultants
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LOCAL LEGISLATION—CALIFORNIA—Lawmakers pass legislation preventing use of force majeure provision for labor disputes by waste service providers, (Sep 29, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:International Brotherhood of Teamsters | Republic Services | Waste Management

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Teamsters applauded the move, which prohibits the use of such provisions to shield providers in the event of a work stoppage arising out of or in connection with a labor dispute.

    Over the weekend, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 1371 ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Teamsters applauded the move, which prohibits the use of such provisions to shield providers in the event of a work stoppage arising out of or in connection with a labor dispute.

    Over the weekend, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 1371, which prohibits any franchise contracts, licenses, or permits for solid waste handling services entered into or substantially amended by a local agency on or after January 1, 2027, from including a force majeure provision that excuses or suspends the service provider’s obligation to perform under the franchise contract, license, or permit in the event of a work stoppage arising out of or in connection with a labor dispute.

    Void and unenforceable. The bill would also provide that any force majeure provision in a franchise contract, license, or permit for solid waste handling services is void and unenforceable to the extent that it excuses or suspends performance due to a work stoppage arising out of or in connection with a labor dispute.

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters is applauding this effort, which it claims will safeguard sanitation workers and hold waste haulers accountable for prolonging work stoppages.

    Treated like a natural disaster. Contracts between waste companies and municipalities typically have a “force majeure” clause, the union notes, which shields the company from being penalized for failing to fulfill its contractual obligations during major disruptions like natural disasters. However, those same companies often include labor disputes as a qualifying force majeure disruption.

    SB 1371 closes this loophole, Teamsters explains.

    “This is a big day for California workers. For too long, waste companies have gotten away with making communities and unions foot the bill for employer-caused strikes,” said Peter Finn, Co-Chair of Teamsters California. “SB 1371 goes a long way toward leveling the playing field.”

    Trying to drive public sentiment. The Teamsters represent thousands of waste workers throughout the state. Currently, over 3,000 of them represented by Teamsters Local 396 are bargaining for new contracts with major employers, including Republic Services and Waste Management.

    “Waste companies always try to turn the public against workers who are forced to strike for better conditions—even when the employers cause the strike and keep getting paid for collections that aren’t happening,” said Mike Di Bene, a 15-year Republic Services driver represented by Teamsters Local 70. “This is one of the worst things management does to try to hurt union waste workers like me. But thanks to SB 1371, California haulers can no longer use this abusive tactic. Now, workers have the power.”

    News: StateLegislation LaborNews Labor IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use