Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—NCAA accused of fixing compensation for top college athletes
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau approves sale of Agrium assets to CHS
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC conditionally approves acquisition of Mivisa by Crown
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Federal claims against Mitsubishi in CRT price fixing suit avoid dismissal
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Forum selection clause bars Sharp’s claims against Toshiba in U.S. court
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Indirect purchaser’s MCPA claims against CRT manufacturers barred
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Sharp stated plausible federal antitrust claims against CRT manufacturers; most state antitrust claims time barred
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Tolling provisions in California, New York law save CRT price fixing claims
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Arkansas used car dealer charged by FTC for failure to display Buyer's Guides
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Fair Packaging and Labeling Act comment sought by FTC
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Cal.: Arbitration of assets purchase dispute not preliminarily enjoined
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—Ohio App. Ct.: Alcoholic beverage distributorship termination ruling vacated and remanded
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC Commissioner Brill addresses pitfalls of the "internet of things"
    • PRIVACY—D.D.C.: Requesting ZIP codes from consumers upon credit card purchases did not violate D.C. laws
    • RICO—W.D.  Wash.: Civil RICO claim against alleged Ponzi scheme barred by securities fraud exception
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: EC conditionally approves acquisition of Mivisa by Crown, (Mar 17, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Crown Holdings, Inc.

    The European Commission (EC) announced on March 14 that it has cleared the proposed acquisition of Mivisa Envases, S.A.U. of Spain by Crown Holdings, Inc. of the United States. Both Crown and Mivisa manufacture metal food cans used for fruit and vege ...

    The European Commission (EC) announced on March 14 that it has cleared the proposed acquisition of Mivisa Envases, S.A.U. of Spain by Crown Holdings, Inc. of the United States. Both Crown and Mivisa manufacture metal food cans used for fruit and vegetables, fish and seafood, pet food as well as ready-made meals.

    The approval is conditioned upon (1) the divestment of Crown's plants producing metal cans in Spain and (2) the divestment of Mivisa's metal food cans plant in the Netherlands. The EC expressed concern that following the acquisition, the level of competition in markets for metal food cans in the Benelux, France, Spain and Portugal would have been too weak to avoid price increases.

    Crown is a multinational company that manufactures various packaging products for consumer goods (including aerosols, beverage packaging, food cans and metal closures). Crown operates production plants worldwide. Mivisa is headquartered in Spain and has production facilities also in Hungary, the Netherlands, Morocco and Peru. It is primarily active in the manufacturing of tinplate food cans, metal closures and stand-alone can ends.

    The EC concluded that the proposed transaction, as originally proposed, would have given the merged entity very high market shares in the Benelux, France, Spain and Portugal and would have eliminated an important competitor from the market, Mivisa. In each area, only one sizeable competing supplier would have remained (Ardagh in the Benelux, France and Portugal and Auxiliar in Spain). The Commission considered that this remaining supplier would have had limited incentives to compete with the merged entity. Other players would also have had limited ability to supply customers with large volumes and product ranges. Given this lack of alternatives, customers would have likely faced price increases.

    In order to address the EC's concerns, Crown offered to divest its metal cans plants in La Rioja, Murcia, Coruxo-Vigo, Ugao-Miravalles and Montmeló. Crown will also install in the Vigo plant an additional production line, in order to enable this facility to serve Portuguese customers with sufficient capacity for all the sizes of cans which Crown and Mivisa currently sell in Portugal. As a result, the divested plant in Vigo will impose a competitive constraint on the merged entity not only in Spain but also in Portugal. The Commission concluded that the plant in La Rioja can serve clients in southern France, as Mivisa does presently. Mivisa's plant producing metal food cans in Horst (the Netherlands) will also be divested. The facility is also currently used to serve Mivisa's customers in northern France.

    In view of the remedies proposed, the Commission concluded that the transaction, as modified, would raise no competition concerns.

    Companies:  Mivisa Envases, S.A.U.; Crown Holdings, Inc.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use