Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: FTC action leads to ban on marketing dietary supplements with “free” trial offers, health claims
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC seeks comments on planned study of fuel economy advertising claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: County official allegedly engaged in bid-rigging of real estate tax auctions
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: IFA’s suit against Seattle’s $15 minimum wage law proceeds
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Michigan “anti-Tesla” bill would not add new direct sales ban, supporters say
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Antitrust attorneys launch Kesselman Brantly Stockinger LLP
    • PRIVACY—4th Cir.: Debt collection company violates plain language of the TCPA
    • RICO NEWS: Supreme Court denies review of $36M judgment against fraudulent real-estate enterprise
    • RICO—N.D. Tex.: Investor failed to adequately plead continuity to maintain RICO claims against oil well developers
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Nev. Sup. Ct.: New punitive damages trial ordered in consumer action over failed home purchase
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY: FTC action leads to ban on marketing dietary supplements with “free” trial offers, health claims, (Oct 20, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Bureau of Consumer Protection | Chapnick, Smukler & Chapnick, Inc. | DJD Distribution, LLC | Health Formulas, LLC | Longhorn Marketing, LLC | MDCC, LLC | Method Direct, LLC | Pure Vitamins, LLC | VIP Savings, LLC | Weight Loss Dojo, LLC

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    A federal district court has temporarily banned a group of marketers in Nevada and California from conducting business using allegedly deceptive “free” trial offers and health claims to pitch green coffee bean extract and other dietary ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    A federal district court has temporarily banned a group of marketers in Nevada and California from conducting business using allegedly deceptive “free” trial offers and health claims to pitch green coffee bean extract and other dietary supplements, the FTC announced today (FTC v. Health Formulas, LLC, File no. 132-3159).

    According to the agency, this is the first FTC action alleging violations of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), which prohibits marketers from charging consumers in an Internet transaction, unless the marketer has clearly disclosed all material terms of the transaction and obtained the consumers’ express informed consent.

    On October 7, 2014, the FTC filed a complaint in the federal district court for the District of Nevada, alleging that Health Formulas, LLC, its related entities, and principals, doing business as Simple Pure Nutrition, used telemarketing, the Internet, print, radio, and television advertisements to pitch a variety of dietary supplements and other weight-loss, virility, muscle-building, or skin cream products. Simple Pure’s advertising claims included: (1) “Burn fat without diet or exercise”; (2) “Shed pounds fast!”; and (3) “Extreme weight loss!” The FTC alleged that the defendants had no basis for the weight-loss claims they make about their products.

    In addition, the defendants allegedly tricked consumers into disclosing their credit and debit card information, and then enrolled them without authorization in a negative option program in which defendants continually charge consumers’ accounts. The charge for Simple Pure’s weight-loss supplements, with names like Pure Green Coffee Bean Plus and RKG Extreme, typically ranged from $60 to $210 per month. Some consumers were sold additional products that cost between $7.95 and $60.

    The FTC charged that the defendants failed to provide the disclosures required for a negative-option program, failed to provide a way for consumers to stop the automatic charges, and also failed to disclose material facts about their refund and cancellation policy.

    The complaint charged the defendants with violating the FTC Act, the ROSCA, and the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). It also charged the defendants with violating the TSR’s Do Not Call provisions by calling consumers who had asked them to stop calling. Finally, the complaint charged the defendants with violating the Electronic Funds Transfer Act by debiting consumers’ accounts on a recurring basis without their prior written authorization. In its complaint, the FTC sought to permanently stop their allegedly deceptive conduct.

    “The defendants behind Simple Pure used nearly every trick in the book to deceive consumers,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “They not only deceived consumers about the effectiveness of their products, but also repeatedly debited consumers’ accounts without their approval.”

    The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the complaint was 5-0.

    Companies: Health Formulas, LLC; Pure Vitamins, LLC; Longhorn Marketing, LLC; Method Direct, LLC; Weight Loss Dojo, LLC; VIP Savings, LLC; DJD Distribution, LLC; MDCC, LLC; Chapnick, Smukler & Chapnick, Inc.

    MainStory: TopStory ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use