Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Courts Continue to Reject DoJ’s Demands for States’ Unredacted Voter Data
    • CDT Warns About Meta’s Plans for Smart Glasses Facial Recognition System
    • Federal Court Gives DJI Another Chance to Challenge DoD Restrictions
    • Judge Blocks Federal Agencies’ Request for States’ Commercial Driver Information
    • Legislation to Protect Sensitive Personal Info Advances in California
    • New Cyber Laws Enter Into Force in Netherlands
    • Privacy Violations Lead to Fine for Angolan Hotel
    • Some Foreign Routers Removed From FCC’s ‘Covered List’
    • Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Verizon’s FCC Privacy Fine Plea
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider Verizon’s FCC Privacy Fine Plea, (Aug 17, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:AT&T | Verizon | Verizon Communications

    By Paul Kirby

    The U.S. Supreme Court today denied Verizon Communications, Inc.’s request for a rehearing of the court’s 8-1 decision that upheld FCC orders against Verizon and AT&T, Inc., for violating CPNI (customer proprietary network information) ...

    By Paul Kirby

    The U.S. Supreme Court today denied Verizon Communications, Inc.’s request for a rehearing of the court’s 8-1 decision that upheld FCC orders against Verizon and AT&T, Inc., for violating CPNI (customer proprietary network information) protections by providing location data to third parties without customers’ consent (CPR, June 4).

    Verizon had submitted a petition for rehearing asking the court “to make a small change to the bottom-line judgment at the end of its opinion, which currently strips Verizon of the options that the body of the opinion purports to leave open.” The carrier had hoped in Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC et al. (25-567) to seek a refund of the fine imposed on it (CPR, July 6).

    News: FederalLegislation LitigationEnforcement DataPrivacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use