Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—11th Cir.: District court erred in dismissing TSA screener’s Rehab Act claim pursuant to Castro
    • CLASS ACTIONS—D. Colo.: More meat processors agree to settle multi-defendant antitrust class alleging a conspiracy to fix wages
    • EMPLOYEE STATUS—S.D. Tex.: Paralegal was employee of law firm only after she was no longer in business for herself
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—As the NLRB Inches Closer to a Quorum, Here's 5 Potential Developments to Watch
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL Issues Four New Opinion Letters: Key Takeaways for Employers in Hospitality, Public Safety, and Beyond
    • LABOR PULSE—Organized labor and soft secession
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Judge clarifies TRO for ‘confus[ed]’ government defendants who had been ordered to stop layoffs
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Recently filed lawsuits by and against the Trump administration
    • PROCEDURE—6th Cir.: Correctional officer, fired after allegedly harassing comments, brought suit too late
    • PROCEDURE—N.C. Sup. Ct.: North Carolina sets aside state agency deference, holds reviewing courts should consider matters anew
    • REPORTS—EPI provides recommendations to states on strengthening health, safety protections
    • SUPREME COURT DOCKET—Court sets hearing date for FTC termination showdown, grants cert to another Flower Foods arbitration dispute
    • U.S. COURTS NEWS—Judiciary's funding runs out; U.S. courts to continue with only limited operations
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—D. Md.: Qui Tam suit alleging skilled nursing facility violated the FCA gets dismissed
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, SUPREME COURT DOCKET—Court sets hearing date for FTC termination showdown, grants cert to another Flower Foods arbitration dispute, (Oct 20, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Arguments in Trump v. Slaughter will be held on December 8, 2025.

    On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced the cases that will be heard in the beginning of the December session, which will includeTrump v. Slaughter. In that case, the Trump administ ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Arguments in Trump v. Slaughter will be held on December 8, 2025.

    On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced the cases that will be heard in the beginning of the December session, which will includeTrump v. Slaughter. In that case, the Trump administration is asking the Court to overrule longstanding precedent, Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, and to determine that the statutory removal protections for FTC members violate the separation of powers. It also asks the Court to determine whether a federal court may prevent a person’s removal from public office.

    Flower Foods. Additionally, today the Court granted certiorari on another Flower Foods arbitration dispute. In 2024, the High Court ruled that a transportation worker need not work for a company that is in the transportation industry to be exempt from the coverage of Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act, finding that the Second Circuit erred in compelling arbitration of wage claims brought by bakery delivery drivers on the basis that they work in the bakery industry.

    Now, it is being asked whether workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross borders are “transportation workers” “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 exemption. Below, the Tenth Circuit held that the company was not entitled to compel arbitration of putative class and collective FLSA claims alleging that the employer misclassifies its delivery-driver distributors as independent contractors to systematically underpay them. The Tenth Circuit affirmed that the FAA’s Section 1 interstate commerce exemption applied.

    The docket is No. 24-935.

    News: SupremeCourtNews LitigationNewsTrends Arbitration WageHour PublicEmployees WhiteHouseNews AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use