Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—11th Cir.: District court erred in dismissing TSA screener’s Rehab Act claim pursuant to Castro
    • CLASS ACTIONS—D. Colo.: More meat processors agree to settle multi-defendant antitrust class alleging a conspiracy to fix wages
    • EMPLOYEE STATUS—S.D. Tex.: Paralegal was employee of law firm only after she was no longer in business for herself
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—As the NLRB Inches Closer to a Quorum, Here's 5 Potential Developments to Watch
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL Issues Four New Opinion Letters: Key Takeaways for Employers in Hospitality, Public Safety, and Beyond
    • LABOR PULSE—Organized labor and soft secession
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Judge clarifies TRO for ‘confus[ed]’ government defendants who had been ordered to stop layoffs
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Recently filed lawsuits by and against the Trump administration
    • PROCEDURE—6th Cir.: Correctional officer, fired after allegedly harassing comments, brought suit too late
    • PROCEDURE—N.C. Sup. Ct.: North Carolina sets aside state agency deference, holds reviewing courts should consider matters anew
    • REPORTS—EPI provides recommendations to states on strengthening health, safety protections
    • SUPREME COURT DOCKET—Court sets hearing date for FTC termination showdown, grants cert to another Flower Foods arbitration dispute
    • U.S. COURTS NEWS—Judiciary's funding runs out; U.S. courts to continue with only limited operations
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—D. Md.: Qui Tam suit alleging skilled nursing facility violated the FCA gets dismissed
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Recently filed lawsuits by and against the Trump administration, (Oct 20, 2025)

    By WK Editorial Staff

    In a suit brought by the NLRB, it contends that a new California law, passed to fill gaps left by a defunct Board, violates the Supremacy Clause.

    In National Labor Relations Board v. State of California & PERB, E.D. Cal., Case No. 2:25-cv-02979-TLN-CK ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    In a suit brought by the NLRB, it contends that a new California law, passed to fill gaps left by a defunct Board, violates the Supremacy Clause.

    In National Labor Relations Board v. State of California & PERB, E.D. Cal., Case No. 2:25-cv-02979-TLN-CKD, filed on October 15, 2025, the NLRB seeks to block enforcement of California Assembly Bill No. 288 (AB 288), arguing it is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) under the Supremacy Clause. AB 288 allows California’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) to regulate private-sector labor relations when NLRA coverage is lost or the NLRB is deemed to have ceded jurisdiction—based on delays, lack of quorum, or constitutional challenges. The NLRB contends this creates a parallel labor regime that undermines federal uniformity, allowing PERB to impose civil penalties, binding arbitration, and automatic union certification without NLRA safeguards. The complaint contends that only the NLRB can formally cede jurisdiction, and that AB 288 disrupts centralized enforcement. California’s legislative findings cite NLRB inefficiency and assert a state duty to protect workers’ rights. The NLRB seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent AB 288’s implementation.

    In Chamber of Commerce v. DHS & State Dept., D.D.C., Case No. 25-cv-3675, filed on October 16, 2025, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce challenges the presidential proclamation imposing a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa petitions. The Chamber argues the fee violates the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which sets statutory caps and fee structures, and exceeds presidential authority. “The President has significant authority over the entry of noncitizens into the United States,” the complaint states, “but that authority is bounded by statute and cannot directly contradict laws passed by Congress.” However, it claims that Trump’s proclamation “does precisely that: It blatantly contravenes the fees Congress has set for the H-1B program and countermands Congress’s judgment that the program should provide a pathway for up to 85,000 people annually to contribute their talents to the United States for the betterment of American society.”

    The complaint asserts the fee contradicts congressional intent, that it eschewed the requisite rulemaking procedures, and that it harms American businesses—especially small firms—by making skilled foreign labor unaffordable. The Chamber cites economic studies showing H-1B workers boost innovation and productivity, as well as native-born employment. It claims the proclamation unlawfully alters the H-1B program’s structure and violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by being arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by statutory findings. Relief sought includes declaratory judgment, injunction, and vacatur of agency actions.

    In International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. U.S. Department of State, S.D.N.Y., Case No. 25-cv-8566, filed on October 16, 2025, three major unions (UAW, CWA, and AFT) have sued over the “Challenged Surveillance Program,” an interagency initiative targeting visa holders and lawful permanent residents for online speech deemed anti-American, antisemitic, or pro-Palestinian. The program uses AI tools (e.g., ShadowDragon, ONYX, Babel X) to monitor sentiment and keywords across over 100 social media platforms. Executive Orders 14161 and 14188 authorize vetting for hostile views, leading to visa revocations, deportations, and public threats. Plaintiffs allege First Amendment violations—viewpoint discrimination, coercive threats, and suppression of association and information—and APA violations. Surveys show widespread chilling effects: noncitizens scrub social media, avoid union activity, and decline leadership roles. Unions report reduced engagement and diverted resources. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to halt surveillance, purge records, and vacate agency actions.

    News: AgencyNews LitigationNewsTrends LaborNews ImmigrationNews Immigration IndividualRights WhiteHouseNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use