Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • FTC Intends to Police Retailers’ Use of ‘Surveillance Pricing’
    • D. Mass.: Most Meta Pixel, Google Analytics website tracking privacy claims against hospital survive dismissal
    • Financial Regulator Urged to Close Gap Exploited by Cyber Thieves
    • Latvian Regulator Outlines Methodology of Response to Personal Data Leaks
    • Nonprofit Appeals Denial of Cybersecurity Pilot Program Funding
    • Power Inverters Eligible for Clean-Energy Tax Credits Removed From FCC’s Covered List
    • TCPA, Fax, Robocall Petitions Deemed ‘Moot’ by FCC Bureau
    • U.K. Privacy Agency Highlights Parental Concerns About Children’s Online Activities
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Nonprofit Appeals Denial of Cybersecurity Pilot Program Funding, (Aug 20, 2026)

    By Jeff Williams

    Tri-County Community Action, Inc., has appealed a June 30 decision by the Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC) that completely denied the company’s request for Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program funding after determining ...

    By Jeff Williams

    Tri-County Community Action, Inc., has appealed a June 30 decision by the Universal Service Administrative Co. (USAC) that completely denied the company’s request for Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program funding after determining that some equipment and/or services included in its request fell outside the scope of the pilot eligible services list (P-ESL).

    In a filing posted in the FCC’s electronic comment filing system, Tri-County said it “respectfully submits that there was a reasonable basis for requesting Pilot support for the proposed endpoint cybersecurity solution based upon the Commission’s broad and functional eligibility framework, the express inclusion of Endpoint Protection, and the P-ESL’s specific identification of TPM [trusted platform modules] and products with TPM chips.”

    In addition to a reversal of the complete denial of its request for a total of $30,935.70, Tri-County asked for “an opportunity to identify, document, cost allocate, and obtain Pilot support for any eligible cybersecurity-specific portion of the competitively bid solution.”

    Tri-County said it was seeking reconsideration “because the requested solution was consistently presented as an endpoint cybersecurity solution containing functionality expressly contemplated by the P-ESL, including TPM-based security and endpoint protection.”

    The company also acknowledged that it filed the appeal outside the Commission’s 30-day appeal window for the program and noted that it concurrently filed a request seeking a waiver of that deadline.

    “The late filing resulted from an inadvertent reliance on the 60-day appeal period applicable to the longstanding E-Rate program rather than the shorter 30-day period adopted specifically for the new Cybersecurity Pilot Program,” Tri-County said.

    News: FederalLegislation DataSecurity

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use