Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • FTC Intends to Police Retailers’ Use of ‘Surveillance Pricing’
    • D. Mass.: Most Meta Pixel, Google Analytics website tracking privacy claims against hospital survive dismissal
    • Financial Regulator Urged to Close Gap Exploited by Cyber Thieves
    • Latvian Regulator Outlines Methodology of Response to Personal Data Leaks
    • Nonprofit Appeals Denial of Cybersecurity Pilot Program Funding
    • Power Inverters Eligible for Clean-Energy Tax Credits Removed From FCC’s Covered List
    • TCPA, Fax, Robocall Petitions Deemed ‘Moot’ by FCC Bureau
    • U.K. Privacy Agency Highlights Parental Concerns About Children’s Online Activities
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Latvian Regulator Outlines Methodology of Response to Personal Data Leaks, (Aug 20, 2026)

    By Tony Foley

    The Data State Inspectorate (DVI), Latvia’s data protection authority, has provided guidance on its response to data breach notifications and what individuals should do when a breach occurs.

    The guidance, issued in a news release, outlines DVI& ...

    By Tony Foley

    The Data State Inspectorate (DVI), Latvia’s data protection authority, has provided guidance on its response to data breach notifications and what individuals should do when a breach occurs.

    The guidance, issued in a news release, outlines DVI’s typical response on being notified of a data breach, including determining the scope and circumstances of the breach and any measures that have been taken to prevent or mitigate its consequences. The agency will consider a variety of factors in its investigation, including what organizational and technical security measures were in place, and whether the organization assessed risks and properly managed them. DVI emphasized that the occurrence of a breach did not necessarily mean that an organization failed to comply with data protection requirements but added that its investigations would analyze why the breach occurred, whether the risk was reasonably foreseeable, and whether the security measures were adequate.

    The guidance advises individuals that it is generally not necessary to file an individual complaint with DVI when the agency is already aware of a breach but added that contacting it might be useful if the individual had new or previously unknown relevant information.

    Individuals who find out that a leak has occurred in an organization holding their personal data should review the information provided by the organization, which must specify the known scope of the incident, the personal data affected, the possible consequences, and any mitigation measures taken. If, after reading the organization’s notice, individuals still have specific questions about their personal data, they are permitted to request clarification from the organization.

    News: InternationalLegislation DataSecurity DataBreach DataPrivacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use