Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
    • Cotton Seeks Security Probe of Payment Firm’s Chinese Ties
    • Bill to Promote Foreign Sales of U.S. Cyber Technologies Advances in Senate
    • Collective Defense Can Counter Hostile Nations’ Cyber Attacks, U.K.’s Cyber Chief Says
    • Defense Bill Amendment Would Renew Cyber Grant Program for State, Local Governments
    • Delaware Bill to Expand Data Breach Law Advances
    • FCC to Consider Emergency Alert Cybersecurity at June 25 Meeting
    • Italy Fines Airline Over Improper Retention of Passenger Health Data
    • N.C. Senate OKs Bill to Restrict Robocalls, ‘Spoofing’
  • Articles
  • Articles

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, N.C. Senate OKs Bill to Restrict Robocalls, ‘Spoofing’, (Jun 18, 2026)

    By Carrie DeLeon

    The North Carolina state Senate voted this week to pass a bill that would modify the state’s telephone solicitation laws to require prior express written consent from subscribers to receive robocalls.

    HB 936 defines prior express written consen ...

    By Carrie DeLeon

    The North Carolina state Senate voted this week to pass a bill that would modify the state’s telephone solicitation laws to require prior express written consent from subscribers to receive robocalls.

    HB 936 defines prior express written consent as “an agreement, in writing, bearing the signature of the telephone subscriber that clearly authorizes the telephone solicitor to deliver or cause to be delivered to the telephone subscriber telephone solicitations, and the telephone number to which the signatory authorizes such telephone solicitations to be delivered.”

    In addition, the bill defines a robocall as a “voice communication that delivers artificial, artificially generated, or prerecorded voice messages, in whole or in part, including, but not limited to, telephone calls utilizing soundboard technology and ringless voicemail messages.” Under the bill, robocalls would include “spam and scam text messages received by a telephone subscriber through a messaging application.”

    The bill would restrict robocalls before 8 a.m. and after 9 p.m. The bill would also place additional restrictions on “call spoofing” and impersonating government officials. It provides that no telephone solicitor or robocaller “shall cause misleading information to be transmitted to users of caller identification technologies or otherwise block or misrepresent the origin of a telephone solicitation or robocall.”

    The bill, if enacted, would become effective Oct. 1.

    The bill (H.B. 936, Reg Sess.) is sponsored by Rep. Dudley Greene (R.).

    News: StateLegislation DataPrivacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use