Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Former EEOC Commissioner Samuels sues over removal
    • ARBITRATION—E.D.N.C.: EFAA did not block arbitration of Black employee’s race bias lawsuit despite allegations of sexual remarks
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—11th Cir.: No en banc review of decision finding no implied right of action in Title IX for sex discrimination in employment
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—E.D. Mo.: Outreach worker, terminated after mayor’s alleged threat, largely fails to advance claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—PAY—E.D. Pa.: Employer willfully violated discovery order for pay documents of employee’s comparators
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuit, $40K settlement in pregnancy discrimination cases; sex discrimination claimants sought
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal judge restrains liability for alleged false DEI certifications
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Wyoming bans most non-compete agreements
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—Bicameral Raise the Wage Act would increase minimum wage to $17
    • RETALIATION—5th Cir.: Fired football employee who alleged harassment denied new trial on retaliation claims
    • RETALIATION—M.D. Fla.: City clerk suspended then fired after filing grievance, taking FMLA leave, advances reprisal claims
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—High Court stays preliminary injunction reinstating fired federal probationary employees
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—D.D.C.: Court dismisses whistleblower’s complaint due to insufficient factual detail
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Former EEOC Commissioner Samuels sues over removal, (Apr 9, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In “illegally” removing her, she argues, Trump “undermined the EEOC’s historic independence and interfered with its statutorily mandated duties to protect workers from discrimination, at a time when workers around the coun ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In “illegally” removing her, she argues, Trump “undermined the EEOC’s historic independence and interfered with its statutorily mandated duties to protect workers from discrimination, at a time when workers around the country are particularly vulnerable to discrimination.”

    EEOC Commissioner Jocelyn Samuels, who alleges she was illegally removed from her position by President Trump on January 27, 2025, without cause, has filed a lawsuit against Trump, the EEOC, and Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, alleging that the President’s actions were ultra vires. Samuels was nominated by Trump in 2020 and confirmed and then renominated in 2021. Her term is not set to expire until July 2026.

    First time in agency’s history. She alleges that Congress has not granted the president authority to remove EEOC commissioners at will and that when Trump directed the EEOC to remove her in January, he lacked cause to do so. “The removal of Commissioner Samuels,” the complaint states, “along with the removal of fellow Democratic Commissioner Charlotte Burrows on the same day, constitutes the first time in the EEOC’s almost 61-year history that a president has sought to remove a member of the Commission prior to the expiration of their term.”

    Undermines and interferes. In “illegally” removing her, Samuels alleges, Trump has “undermined the EEOC’s historic independence and interfered with its statutorily mandated duties to protect workers from discrimination, at a time when workers around the country are particularly vulnerable to discrimination.”

    “Trump’s illegal removal of Commissioner Samuels,” the complaint explains, “as carried out by Defendants EEOC and Lucas, has significant and damaging consequences for the work of the Commission, the enforcement of the nation’s anti-discrimination laws, and the rights and interests of both workers and employers. While the President may accept these results, his actions to incapacitate the EEOC are contrary to the rule of law and harmful to the American workforce.”

    Samuels seeks declaratory and injunctive relief.

    The case is No. 1:25-cv-01069.

    MainStory: TopStory LitigationNewsTrends AgencyNews WhiteHouseNews Discharge PublicEmployees GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use