Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Former EEOC Commissioner Samuels sues over removal
    • ARBITRATION—E.D.N.C.: EFAA did not block arbitration of Black employee’s race bias lawsuit despite allegations of sexual remarks
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—11th Cir.: No en banc review of decision finding no implied right of action in Title IX for sex discrimination in employment
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—E.D. Mo.: Outreach worker, terminated after mayor’s alleged threat, largely fails to advance claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—PAY—E.D. Pa.: Employer willfully violated discovery order for pay documents of employee’s comparators
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuit, $40K settlement in pregnancy discrimination cases; sex discrimination claimants sought
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal judge restrains liability for alleged false DEI certifications
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Wyoming bans most non-compete agreements
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—Bicameral Raise the Wage Act would increase minimum wage to $17
    • RETALIATION—5th Cir.: Fired football employee who alleged harassment denied new trial on retaliation claims
    • RETALIATION—M.D. Fla.: City clerk suspended then fired after filing grievance, taking FMLA leave, advances reprisal claims
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—High Court stays preliminary injunction reinstating fired federal probationary employees
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—D.D.C.: Court dismisses whistleblower’s complaint due to insufficient factual detail
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal judge restrains liability for alleged false DEI certifications, (Apr 9, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Foley & Lardner
    Organizations Mentioned:Foley & Lardner, LLP

    By Lisa Noller, Lori R. Garber, and Ryan J. Lowry of Foley & Lardner

    President Trump's January 21 Executive Order targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programs (DEI) (the "January 21 Executive Order") and, specifically, §3(b)(iv)) (the Certification Provision) cannot be the basis for liability—at least fo ...

    By Lisa Noller, Lori R. Garber, and Ryan J. Lowry of Foley & Lardner

    President Trump's January 21 Executive Order targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programs (DEI) (the "January 21 Executive Order") and, specifically, §3(b)(iv)) (the Certification Provision) cannot be the basis for liability—at least for one proactive litigant in the Northern District of Illinois. The holding could have broader implications for False Claims Act (FCA) defendants concerned about evolving certification requirements.

    On January 20 and 21, 2025, President Trump issued two executive orders targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs (titled, "Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing" and "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," respectfully). The January 21 Executive Order included a direction to agencies (the "Certification Provision") to require federal grant recipients to certify they do not "operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws" and to "agree that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government's payment decisions for purposes of [the FCA]." Immediately, this provision raised concerns that the Trump Administration may use the Certification Provision to bring FCA cases against grant recipients who do not comply. The threat of FCA litigation is paused for now, at least for Chicago Women in Trades (CWIT).

    In February 2025, CWIT sued the Trump administration arguing, among other things, the Certification Provision violates its First Amendment Right to free speech because it "effectively regulates CWIT's conduct outside of the contours of the federal grants." (See Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., Case No.1:25-cv-02005, N.D. Ill.)In response, the government argued the Certification Provision only implicates "illegal" DEI programs and no one has a constitutional right to violate the law. On March 27, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly granted CWIT's motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, preventing the Department of Labor from enforcing the Certification Provision and the Government from "initiat[ing] any False Claims Act enforcement against CWIT pursuant to the Certification Provision."

    In its Order, the court held the Certification Provision's definition of what is an illegal DEI program is "left entirely to the imagination." In the court's view, the government has emphasized that conduct violating anti-discrimination laws has changed, and the government also has been "unwilling to in (in its briefs or at argument) define how it has changed." This uncertainty put CWIT (and other grantees) in a difficult position—they must either decline to make a certification and lose federal grant money or risk making a certification that is later deemed to be false because the meaning of an illegal DEI program is unknown, subjecting "the grantee to liability under the False Claims Act."[1]

    While the Order restricts the Government specifically with respect to CWIT and the Certification Provision, lawsuits like CWIT's will force federal courts across the country to determine what the Certification Provision means for FCA litigation going forward.

    If you have questions about President Trump's January 21 Executive Order or the False Claims Act, contact the authors or your Foley relationship lawyer.

    Footnotes

    1. The court also said even if the government did define an illegal DEI program, the January 21 executive order still reads as an "express reference to First Amendment-protected speech and advocacy."

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lisa Noller, Lori R. Garber and Ryan J. Lowry

    Foley & Lardner

    321 North Clark Street, Suite 3000

    Chicago

    United States

    Tel.: +1 312 832 4500

    E-mail: info@foley.com

    URL: www.foley.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd., 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Foley & Lardner).

    ExpertInsights: Discrimination RaceDiscrimination SexDiscrimination NationalOrigin IndividualRights WhiteHouseNews AgencyNews IllinoisNews PracticeTip

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use