Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—9th Cir.: Government denied emergency stay of order requiring reinstatement offers for fired probationary employees
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM seeks agency information on costs of collective bargaining
    • DISCHARGE—M.D. Fla.: Gay director who complained of CEO’s ‘flamboyant’ remark advances discrimination, retaliation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Pa.: Fired HR analyst advances claims involving replacement by younger employee of different race
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—D. Nev.: Pregnant bartender fired after seeking reduced schedule gets trial on bias, non-accommodation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: City employee, barred from presenting comparator timecard evidence, denied new trial
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: Discharged Catholic nurse’s failure-to-accommodate claim in vaccine-refusal case may proceed to trial
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—A look at changes to Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—FP SCOTUS predictions: Court will make it easier for majority-group plaintiffs to assert Title VII claims, no more ‘reverse‘ discrimination
    • HOUSE NEWS—Ranking committee members file FOIA request for information about DOGE
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—EEOC sends letters to 20 law firms demanding DEI information
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Congressional Research Service sidebar explains how court orders are enforced against the Executive Branch
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—E.D. Va.: H-2B amusement ride workers survive employer argument it was exempt from FLSA wage claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—2d Cir.: Question of compensability of mandatory security screenings certified in Connecticut
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Congressional Research Service sidebar explains how court orders are enforced against the Executive Branch, (Mar 18, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In the Legal Side Bar, the CRS explains how injunctions may be enforced through contempt proceedings and the tools at Congress’s disposal if it believes an executive agency or officer is acting unlawfully.

    In a revised Legal Side Bar issued ear ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    In the Legal Side Bar, the CRS explains how injunctions may be enforced through contempt proceedings and the tools at Congress’s disposal if it believes an executive agency or officer is acting unlawfully.

    In a revised Legal Side Bar issued earlier this month, the Congressional Research Service provided a primer on how court orders are enforced against federal agencies and executive branch officials, noting that while President Trump has stated he intends to comply with court orders, “recent litigation has generated discussion around what happens if the executive branch defies a court order and whether federal agencies or officials may be compelled to comply with court orders.”

    Rhode Island and D.C. litigation. In the document, CRS explains how injunctions may be enforced through contempt proceedings and provides real-time examples from current litigation, including the Rhode Island funding freeze litigation and the D.C. federal court litigation over foreign assistance funds.

    Additionally, the document provides information on what options are available for Congress, should it believe that an executive agency or officer is acting unlawfully, including the advice and consent power available solely to the Senate.

    It ends by noting: “Beyond the context of specific disputes involving the executive branch, Congress also has the authority to change the laws that apply to contempt of court generally. For example, Congress could amend the contempt statute to clarify what sanctions are available against the federal government.”

    News: LitigationNewsTrends AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use