Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—9th Cir.: Government denied emergency stay of order requiring reinstatement offers for fired probationary employees
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM seeks agency information on costs of collective bargaining
    • DISCHARGE—M.D. Fla.: Gay director who complained of CEO’s ‘flamboyant’ remark advances discrimination, retaliation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Pa.: Fired HR analyst advances claims involving replacement by younger employee of different race
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—D. Nev.: Pregnant bartender fired after seeking reduced schedule gets trial on bias, non-accommodation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: City employee, barred from presenting comparator timecard evidence, denied new trial
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: Discharged Catholic nurse’s failure-to-accommodate claim in vaccine-refusal case may proceed to trial
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—A look at changes to Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—FP SCOTUS predictions: Court will make it easier for majority-group plaintiffs to assert Title VII claims, no more ‘reverse‘ discrimination
    • HOUSE NEWS—Ranking committee members file FOIA request for information about DOGE
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—EEOC sends letters to 20 law firms demanding DEI information
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Congressional Research Service sidebar explains how court orders are enforced against the Executive Branch
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—E.D. Va.: H-2B amusement ride workers survive employer argument it was exempt from FLSA wage claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—2d Cir.: Question of compensability of mandatory security screenings certified in Connecticut
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, AGENCY NEWS—OPM seeks agency information on costs of collective bargaining, (Mar 18, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Office of Personnel Management

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Federal agencies have spent millions on CBAs that impose significant costs on American taxpayers while impeding efficient agency operations, the memo claims.

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is requiring information from agencies regarding the ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Federal agencies have spent millions on CBAs that impose significant costs on American taxpayers while impeding efficient agency operations, the memo claims.

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is requiring information from agencies regarding the costs of collective bargaining to taxpayers. The information requested includes the expenses of bargaining, monitoring, and administrating collective bargaining agreements, as well as information regarding current CBAs. The standardized submission form, which OPM attached to the memo, must be submitted electronically.

    Collective bargaining expenses. By April 18, 2025, agencies must submit details from fiscal year (FY) 2024 regarding compensation paid to agency employees to negotiate CBAs, negotiate midterm agreements, process grievances pursuant to grievance-arbitration provisions in CBAs, and engage in mediation, arbitration, and impasse resolution in connection with collective bargaining disputes. Agencies must also submit information on arbitral fees paid to arbitrators hearing grievances pursuant to CBA grievance-arbitration provisions, expenses paid for retaining experts to assist in CBA negotiations, and expenses paid for factfinders, mediators, and arbitrators to settle collective bargaining disputes, as well as travel and lodging expenses for agency and union staff negotiating CBAs paid or reimbursed with tax dollars. The OPM further requested information regarding the costs of administrative support and supplies, costs of acquiring and using technology for bargaining, monitoring, and administrating CBAs, the fair market value of agency office space provided to labor unions, and penalties levied related to collective bargaining.

    Current collective bargaining agreements. Agencies must submit the details of all CBAs currently in force at the agency, including the date the CBA was executed and its scheduled expiration date and the length of time spent negotiating each CBA, broken out by each stage of the negotiation. With respect to midterm negotiations that occurred in FY 2024, the agencies must provide information including the date the negotiations were commenced, the date the negotiations concluded, any applicable impasse proceedings, or whether the negotiations remain ongoing.

    News: AgencyNews LaborNews Labor Bargaining UnionsMembers PublicEmployees

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use