Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—9th Cir.: Government denied emergency stay of order requiring reinstatement offers for fired probationary employees
    • AGENCY NEWS—OPM seeks agency information on costs of collective bargaining
    • DISCHARGE—M.D. Fla.: Gay director who complained of CEO’s ‘flamboyant’ remark advances discrimination, retaliation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Pa.: Fired HR analyst advances claims involving replacement by younger employee of different race
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—D. Nev.: Pregnant bartender fired after seeking reduced schedule gets trial on bias, non-accommodation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: City employee, barred from presenting comparator timecard evidence, denied new trial
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Ariz.: Discharged Catholic nurse’s failure-to-accommodate claim in vaccine-refusal case may proceed to trial
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—A look at changes to Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—FP SCOTUS predictions: Court will make it easier for majority-group plaintiffs to assert Title VII claims, no more ‘reverse‘ discrimination
    • HOUSE NEWS—Ranking committee members file FOIA request for information about DOGE
    • INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—EEOC sends letters to 20 law firms demanding DEI information
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Congressional Research Service sidebar explains how court orders are enforced against the Executive Branch
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—E.D. Va.: H-2B amusement ride workers survive employer argument it was exempt from FLSA wage claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—WORKING TIME—2d Cir.: Question of compensability of mandatory security screenings certified in Connecticut
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, INDUSTRY NEWS, TRENDS—EEOC sends letters to 20 law firms demanding DEI information, (Mar 18, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Cooley, LLP | Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP | Goodwin Procter, LLP | Hogan Lovells, LLP | Kirkland & Ellis, LLP | Latham & Watkins, LLP | McDermott Will & Emery, LLP | Milbank, LLP | Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP | Morrison & Foerster, LLP | Perkins Coie, LLP | Reed Smith, LLP | Ropes & Gray, LLP | Sidley Austin, LLP | Simpson Thacher | Skadden Arps | White & Case, LLP | Wilmer Hale, LLP

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “The EEOC is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head, including in our nation’s elite law firms,” claims Acting Chair Andrea Lucas. “No one is above the law—and certainly not the private ba ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “The EEOC is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head, including in our nation’s elite law firms,” claims Acting Chair Andrea Lucas. “No one is above the law—and certainly not the private bar.”

    On Monday, the EEOC’s Acting Chair Andrea Lucas announced that she sent letters to 20 law firms stating that she is “concerned” about their diversity and inclusion employment practices, is seeking responses to certain questions, and is instructing them to “[p]lease also preserve all relevant records.” She appears to cast aspersion on the fact that several of the firms have “publicly touted” their diversity goals and programs.

    Lucas’s letters state that she is “concerned that [the law firm’s] ‘diversity and inclusion’ or other employment programs, policies, and practices may entail unlawful disparate treatment in terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, or unlawful limiting, segregating, and classifying based—in whole or in part—on race, sex, or other protected characteristics, in violation of Title VII.”

    The law firms that received these letters include the following: A & O Shearman; Debevoise & Plimpton LLP; Cooley LLP; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP; Goodwin Procter LLP; Hogan Lovells LLP; Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Latham & Watkins LLP; McDermott Will & Emery; Milbank LLP; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP; Morrison & Foerster LLP; Perkins Coie; Reed Smith; Ropes & Gray LLP; Sidley Austin LLP; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; White & Case LLP; and WilmerHale.

    “The EEOC is prepared to root out discrimination anywhere it may rear its head, including in our nation’s elite law firms,” said Lucas. “No one is above the law—and certainly not the private bar.”

    Also, the release states that the EEOC has established a method by which DEI whistleblowers can submit information.

    News: IndustryNewsTrends AgencyNews Discrimination

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use