Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—3d Cir.: Norris-LaGuardia Act barred federal district court from enjoining ALJ proceedings as ‘unconstitutional’
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—D.N.J.: PE teacher, rejected for job given to candidate 19 years younger, beats summary judgment
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—C.D. Ill.: Physician’s assistant whose revenue declined following knee surgery advances bias claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—2d Cir.: $484,000 jury verdict in favor of school principal on gender bias claims upheld
    • DOL NEWS—Employer on the hook for $1.45M in penalties after worker sustained fatal injuries
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL—EEOC partnership expands coordinated enforcement on national origin discrimination under ‘Project Firewall’
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Feds halt immigration applications from 19 countries and signal broader freeze: What employers need to know
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—California AG Bonta leads coalition in opposition of end of automatic extension of employment authorization
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—State Department instructs H-1B visa applicants to ‘adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to public’
    • LABOR—UNIONS, UNION MEMBERS—1st Cir.: Employee gets second chance to establish entitlement to attorney fees
    • LOCAL LEGISLATION—OHIO—Governor DeWine vetoes bill that would allow 14- and 15-year-olds to work until 9 p.m. on school nights
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—Many NLRA Changes Proposed but Can Any Pass the Senate?
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—E.D.N.Y.: Amazon wins preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of New York state law that sought to expand state’s labor coverage
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—N.D. Tex.: Engineering firm’s former business manager not exempt under the FLSA administrative exemption
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, IMMIGRATION NEWS—California AG Bonta leads coalition in opposition of end of automatic extension of employment authorization, (Dec 4, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Secretary of Homeland Security

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The AGs argue that DHS has not sufficiently considered the harmful effects of the interim final rule on EAD holders nor the full impacts on states’ residents.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a coalition of 18 attorneys general in o ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The AGs argue that DHS has not sufficiently considered the harmful effects of the interim final rule on EAD holders nor the full impacts on states’ residents.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a coalition of 18 attorneys general in opposing a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) interim final rule ending DHS’s automatic extension of employment authorization pending renewal of certain workers’ Employment Authorization Documents (EADs).

    EAD renewal applications. In a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and Director of USCIS Joseph Edlow, a coalition of 18 attorneys general, including Bonta, opposed a DHS interim final rule ending DHS’s policy of automatically extending employment authorization for up to 540 days for many categories of immigrants, such as those with pending asylum applications, who timely file EAD renewal applications. Under the interim final rule, the applicants will no longer receive an automatic extension while the renewal application is pending, and, when their EAD expires, will no longer be authorized to work until USCIS issues a new EAD. While immigrants may apply for renewal 180 days before the expiration date, USCIS faces significant backlogs in processing the applications.

    The attorneys general argued that the interim final rule violates the APA, as it was improperly promulgated without notice and comment. The attorneys general further argued that the interim final rule is arbitrary and capricious, as DHS’s national security justifications are unreasonable and the interim final rule functions only to increase the number of individuals subject to removal.

    Finally, the attorneys general argued that DHS has not sufficiently considered the harmful effects of the interim final rule on EAD holders nor the full impacts of the rule on states’ residents. The lapses in work authorization renewals “will inevitably lead to countless problems for the States’ residents caused by unnecessary and prolonged unemployment, which inevitably leads to general economic instability (insurance, housing, and food instability), strains on health (limited access to insurance, avoiding preventative care, worsening health), and forcing many into a ‘shadow’ economy of unauthorized workers,” the attorney generals wrote.

    News: ImmigrationNews AgencyNews Immigration

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use