Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—3d Cir.: Norris-LaGuardia Act barred federal district court from enjoining ALJ proceedings as ‘unconstitutional’
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—D.N.J.: PE teacher, rejected for job given to candidate 19 years younger, beats summary judgment
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—C.D. Ill.: Physician’s assistant whose revenue declined following knee surgery advances bias claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—2d Cir.: $484,000 jury verdict in favor of school principal on gender bias claims upheld
    • DOL NEWS—Employer on the hook for $1.45M in penalties after worker sustained fatal injuries
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL—EEOC partnership expands coordinated enforcement on national origin discrimination under ‘Project Firewall’
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Feds halt immigration applications from 19 countries and signal broader freeze: What employers need to know
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—California AG Bonta leads coalition in opposition of end of automatic extension of employment authorization
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—State Department instructs H-1B visa applicants to ‘adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to public’
    • LABOR—UNIONS, UNION MEMBERS—1st Cir.: Employee gets second chance to establish entitlement to attorney fees
    • LOCAL LEGISLATION—OHIO—Governor DeWine vetoes bill that would allow 14- and 15-year-olds to work until 9 p.m. on school nights
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—Many NLRA Changes Proposed but Can Any Pass the Senate?
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—E.D.N.Y.: Amazon wins preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of New York state law that sought to expand state’s labor coverage
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—N.D. Tex.: Engineering firm’s former business manager not exempt under the FLSA administrative exemption
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL—EEOC partnership expands coordinated enforcement on national origin discrimination under ‘Project Firewall’, (Dec 4, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Ogletree Deakins
    Organizations Mentioned:Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC | U.S. Department of Homeland Security | U.S. Department of Justice | U.S. Department of Labor | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    By T. Scott Kelly, Bernhard Mueller and Nonnie Shivers of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    On November 24, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a formal partnership with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Project Firewall to intensify enforcement against employers engaging in unlawful national origi ...

    By T. Scott Kelly, Bernhard Mueller and Nonnie Shivers of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    On November 24, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a formal partnership with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Project Firewall to intensify enforcement against employers engaging in unlawful national origin discrimination, including hiring practices that disadvantage American workers.

    The DOL's announcement comes on the heels of new EEOC anti-American bias educational materials and underscores federal agencies' enhanced data sharing, aligned enforcement tools, and coordinated guidance to deter discriminatory hiring, particularly where job postings or screening practices may prefer nonimmigrant visa holders (such as H-1B) over qualified U.S. workers.

    Quick Hits

    • The EEOC, the DOL, the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are coordinating efforts related to national origin discrimination and anti-American bias.

    • As part of Project Firewall, the DOL and EEOC plan to share data, align enforcement tools, and facilitate referrals addressing discriminatory hiring and potential H-1B program abuses.

    • Given this coordination, employers may see and potentially should anticipate inquiries or involvement from more than one agency investigating alleged national origin discrimination or anti-American bias.

    The new formal partnership builds on the EEOC's recent technical assistance and educational updates, which emphasize that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects all workers—including American workers—from national origin discrimination.

    That one-page guidance from the EEOC states that potential business rationales, such as labor costs, customer preferences, or stereotypes, do not justify discriminatory practices. Additionally, the EEOC's one-pager and updated national origin resources flag several high-risk areas: visa-status preferences in job ads (e.g., "H-1B only" or "H-1B preferred"); disparate treatment in application and promotion processes that make it harder for U.S. workers to advance; and retaliation or harassment tied to national origin. Notably, the EEOC's recent materials previewed a multiagency enforcement posture—now reinforced by the DOL's Project Firewall announcement.

    Project Firewall operationalizes that multiagency approach by facilitating information sharing "as permitted by law," clarifying employer obligations, and aligning enforcement pathways so that potential Title VII violations can proceed in tandem with DOL actions addressing H-1B misuse and related program compliance. The partnership also involves the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), signaling a whole-of-government focus on practices that may prefer foreign workers or visa holders over qualified Americans.

    Next Steps

    In light of the federal enforcement agency coordination, employers may wish to assess how their recruiting and hiring practices reference or rely on visa status, particularly where postings or screening criteria could be perceived as favoring nonimmigrant visa holders. Employers might also consider reviewing their practices against the themes noted in recent EEOC technical assistance and determining whether conducting attorney-client privileged audits of selection, promotion, and pay practices can help ensure practices are neutral, job-related, and applied consistently. Training appropriate stakeholders on Title VII's protections as they relate to national origin, as well as creating and maintaining contemporaneous documentation of merit-based and legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons, can assist in responding to agency questions that may arise.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    T. Scott Kelly, Bernhard Mueller and Nonnie Shivers

    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

    Peachtree Tower

    191 Peachtree St NW #4800,

    Atlanta

    GA 30308

    United States

    Tel.: +1 404 881-1300

    E-mail: client.services@ogletreedeakins.com

    URL: www.ogletree.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Ogletree Deakins).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights AgencyNews Discrimination NationalOrigin Immigration IndustryNewsTrends ESGNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use