Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • CISA Prepares for Shutdown After Congress Fails to Pass Funding Bill
    • CISA plans to gather more feedback on delayed cyber incident reporting rules
    • D. Conn.: Suit over federally-supported community health center’s data breach is remanded to state court
    • Dutch Privacy Office Issues Warning About Use of OpenClaw AI
    • House Bill Would Withhold Tax Breaks From Companies Using Untrustworthy Tech
    • Kansas Lawmakers Advance App Store Accountability Act
    • Legislation to Restrict Chinese Equipment in Telecom Networks Advances in Arizona
    • Mississippi House OKs Kids Online Safety Bill
    • Nebraska Lawmakers Eye Data-Collection Tax for Social Media Companies
    • Recognition of Chinese Testing Labs Withdrawn by FCC Over Security Concerns
    • Responsibilities of DPOs Within EUIs Clarified by EDPS
    • U.K. Privacy Office Offers Guidance on Handling Complaints
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, House Bill Would Withhold Tax Breaks From Companies Using Untrustworthy Tech, (Feb 13, 2026)

    By Tom Leithauser

    Legislation that would withhold tax incentives from companies that use technologies controlled by foreign adversaries has been introduced in the House.

    The Deterring Adversarial Access to Americans’ Data Act (H.R. 7509, 119th Cong. (2026)) woul ...

    By Tom Leithauser

    Legislation that would withhold tax incentives from companies that use technologies controlled by foreign adversaries has been introduced in the House.

    The Deterring Adversarial Access to Americans’ Data Act (H.R. 7509, 119th Cong. (2026)) would “disincentivize the use of foreign adversary-controlled technology by denying key tax incentives to companies that use such technology,” according to the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R., Texas).

    The bill would expand Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) restrictions administered by the Department of Energy, which now largely apply to battery technology, to include a wider range of technologies that would be ineligible for certain tax breaks, Rep. Moran explained in a news release.

    “The bill would require companies to sever ties with foreign adversary-controlled technology in order to remain eligible for provisions such as bonus depreciation, research and development expenses, research tax credits, and interest deductibility,” he said.

    “Taxpayer dollars should not subsidize business decisions that expose American data and supply chains to foreign adversaries,” Rep. Moran said. “Companies remain free to choose the technology they use, but eligibility for federal tax incentives is a privilege that should come with a responsibility to protect our economic and national security.”

    News: FederalLegislation DataSecurity

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use