Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • AGENCY NEWS—DOJ tells EEOC that its Title VII disparate impact liability guidelines are unconstitutional
    • AGENCY NEWS—EEOC nets $250K for workers aggrieved by 100 percent healed policy; OSHA imposes $196K fine after worker’s fingers amputated
    • ARBITRATION—9th Cir.: District court erred in compelling arbitration without deciding applicability of state or federal law
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Delaware’s privacy law is about to expand: 6 steps employers and businesses should take to prepare
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Massachusetts rideshare drivers sign up for unionization—and spotlight potential new state law labor avenues
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—House passes Faster Labor Contracts Act after discharge petition
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Worker’s threats and abusive outburst at coworker justified termination
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—NLRB: Employer unlawfully refused to hire predecessor’s unionized valet attendants
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—M.D. Tenn.: Emergency medical provider fails to perfect association-in-fact enterprise pleading for RICO claims
    • PROCEDURE—D.C. Cir.: Liberal pro se pleading standard saves religious discrimination claim
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—7th Cir.: Corrections department rule on use of force not unconstitutionally vague as applied
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—N.D. Miss.: Attorneys for both parties sanctioned for AI generated hallucinations
    • WAGE-HOUR—OVERTIME—7th Cir.: Amazon workers revive Illinois overtime claims based on pre-shift COVID screenings
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL LEGISLATION—House passes Faster Labor Contracts Act after discharge petition, (Jun 10, 2026)

    Organizations Mentioned:U.S. House of Representatives

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The bipartisan measure advancing first-contract bargaining deadlines cleared the chamber in a 220—193 vote.

    The U.S. House of Representatives on June 9, 2026, passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (FLCA) in a 220—193 bipartisan vote afte ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The bipartisan measure advancing first-contract bargaining deadlines cleared the chamber in a 220—193 vote.

    The U.S. House of Representatives on June 9, 2026, passed the Faster Labor Contracts Act (FLCA) in a 220—193 bipartisan vote after Rep. Donald Norcross (D-N.J.) successfully used a discharge petition to force floor consideration. The legislation that would amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to impose timelines and provide mediation and arbitration mechanisms for first collective bargaining agreements.

    The bill proceeded to the floor over the objections of House Republican leadership after the discharge petition secured majority support. Norcross assembled a coalition of 218 members—211 Democrats and 7 Republicans—to compel a vote, a procedural mechanism rarely successful in the House. The House vote follows earlier efforts by Norcross to bring the legislation forward through a discharge petition after it was not scheduled for floor consideration (see Labor & Employment Law Daily, Apr. 21, 2026). Companion legislation has been introduced in the Senate, positioning the FLCA for further consideration in that chamber.

    Faster Labor Contracts Act. The Faster Labor Contracts Act addresses delays in negotiating first contracts following union certification. Under this measure, employers and newly certified unions would be subject to structured timelines for bargaining, including required commencement of negotiations and escalation to mediation and binding arbitration if agreement cannot be reached within specified periods. The legislation contemplates referral to a three-person arbitration panel to secure an initial collective bargaining agreement, which would be binding for a defined term unless modified by mutual consent.

    During debate surrounding the measure’s advancement, supporters emphasized the absence of statutory deadlines under current law. According to information cited in support of the bill, the average time to finalize a first union contract is approximately 458 days, with roughly one-third of workers waiting more than three years after voting to unionize.

    Former NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, testifying before the Senate HELP Committee in 2025, urged Congress to reform federal labor law to address what she described as employer delay tactics in collective bargaining, including in first-contract negotiations. She characterized the National Labor Relations Act as a “pro-worker statute” and said Congress should restore its intended balance by ensuring workers’ rights are not subordinated to corporate interests. Abruzzo cited practices she said she observed during her tenure—such as surface bargaining, refusal to compromise, delay tactics, and challenges to NLRB processes—and called for legislative action to strengthen enforcement, promote organizing, and improve first-contract bargaining (see Labor & Employment Law Daily, Oct. 14, 2025).

    Reinforced statutory protections. Norcross, announcing House passage, described the legislation as closing a gap in existing labor law that allows extended delays in bargaining. “The biggest loophole in labor law is how the richest executives … can simply run out the clock on their workers’ first union contract,” he said, adding that the vote represented bipartisan support for strengthening collective bargaining rights.

    House Democratic leadership likewise characterized the measure as reinforcing statutory protections for organizing and bargaining. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries stated that the bill “strengthen[s] worker protections and compel[s] employers to come to the table,” while emphasizing concerns that employers may refuse to bargain following unionization.

    Labor organizations also endorsed the bill’s passage. Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien described the measure as a “significant milestone” for workers and noted union support for advancing the legislation in the Senate. The bill is backed by more than 20 unions and worker advocacy groups.

    News: FederalLegislation LaborNews Labor Bargaining UnionsMembers

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use