Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LABOR—UNIONS, UNION MEMBERS—D. Conn.: Union for prison workers can continue to challenge termination of CBA
    • AGENCY NEWS—CFPB chafes under delay in obtaining reevaluation of injunction hindering RIF plan
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—M.D. Fla.: Fire department’s fitness-for-duty examination may have violated the ADA
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. La.: African-American refinery worker could not establish HWE despite ‘Coming to America’ meme
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers pay combined $1M-plus to resolve race, sex, disability, and pregnancy discrimination, retaliation allegations
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Supreme Court Picks Up Sun Valley Farms Case: How a Family Farm’s Fight Against H-2A Penalties Could Be a Win for All Employers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Washington's Noncompete Law Is Changing Again: What Employers Need to Know
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—Republican senators introduce bill to block OSHA heat injury standard
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • PROCEDURE—7th Cir.: Complainant Information Sheet filed with state human rights department was not ‘charge’ for purposes of ADA timeliness
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D.D.C.: Emergency injunction to prevent removal of records from Goddard Space Center denied
    • RETALIATION—D. Kan.: Police officer who previously sued for sex discrimination advances retaliatory harassment claim
    • SENATE NEWS—Protecting America’s Workers Act would overhaul OSH Act enforcement and coverage
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Industry leaders explore how people, process, and AI are reshaping the way legal work gets done; Wolters Kluwer 2026 Future Ready Lawyer Survey captures a profession in motion
    • WAGE-HOUR—E.D.N.Y.: Plaintiffs’ counsel directed to refrain from making false representations regarding fee arrangements
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Washington's Noncompete Law Is Changing Again: What Employers Need to Know, (Apr 30, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Fennemore

    By Jacob P. Freeman of Fennemore

    Washington’s legal landscape for noncompetition agreements is changing again. Beginning June 30, 2027, nearly all noncompetition covenants will be void and unenforceable in the state. Washington will join at least four other states in near-tot ...

    By Jacob P. Freeman of Fennemore

    Washington’s legal landscape for noncompetition agreements is changing again. Beginning June 30, 2027, nearly all noncompetition covenants will be void and unenforceable in the state. Washington will join at least four other states in near-total bans of such agreements.

    On March 23, 2026, the governor signed Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1155, which became Chapter 149, 2026 Laws. The act amends sections of RCW Chapter 49.62, Washington’s noncompetition covenants law, which was enacted in 2019 and took effect on January 1, 2020.

    Under the law that took effect in 2020, as previously amended, noncompetition covenants are banned for workers earning below certain annually adjusted thresholds, and the term of any such permissible agreement is presumptively limited to 18 months. The law broadly applies to all noncompete agreements between an employer and its Washington employees and independent contractors.

    The most significant change wrought by HB 1155 is its dictate that beginning on the act's effective date, June 30, 2027, “all noncompetition covenants are void and unenforceable regardless of when the parties entered into the noncompetition covenant.”

    That bears repeating: as of June 30, 2027, all new noncompetition agreements will be banned, and all noncompetition agreements entered before that date will no longer be enforceable from that date forward.

    The act also extends its application to retention bonuses or “stay or pay” agreements: it applies to any provision requiring “that an individual return, repay, or forfeit any right, benefit, or compensation, as a consequence of the individual engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind.”

    A noncompete agreement will be enforceable only if: it’s part of a business sale, and the person signing buys, sells, acquires, or disposes of an ownership interest representing 1% or more of the business; or it's part of an agreement for out-of-pocket educational expense repayment (a training repayment agreement provision, or “TRAP”) that meets certain criteria.

    Furthermore, the act requires that employers, by October 1, 2027, “make reasonable efforts to provide written notice to all current and former employees and independent contractors whose noncompetition covenant is still within its effective time period, that their noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable.” As under the previous law, a person aggrieved by violation of the law is entitled to bring an action and recover the greater of their actual damages or $5,000, plus their attorneys’ fees and costs.

    As amended by HB 1155, the noncompetition covenant law continues to exclude nonsolicitation agreements from the statutory ban but narrows the carveout. To qualify, the restriction must concern a situation where “the employee established or substantially developed a direct relationship with the customer, patient, client, or prospect through the employee's work for the employer.”

    The law also limits nonsolicitation agreements to 18 months after termination of employment. Additionally, the act states that an agreement prohibiting “the acceptance or transaction of business with a customer, patient, or client is not a ‘nonsolicitation agreement’”—clarifying that the act exempts true nonsolicitation agreements only, and not ‘no handling’ agreements.

    Employers should begin reviewing employment, independent contractor, and related form agreements that contain noncompetition or nonsolicitation clauses now to determine whether revisions are needed before the June 30, 2027 effective date. Employers should also begin identifying current and former workers who may need notice by October 1, 2027, that their noncompetition covenants are void and unenforceable.

    Failure to take reasonable steps to provide that notice by the deadline may expose employers to statutory liability.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Jacob P. Freeman

    Fennemore

    2394 E Camelback Rd

    Suite 600

    Phoenix, AZ 85016 United States

    Tel.: +1 602 916 5000

    E-mail: [email protected]

    URL: www.fennemorelaw.com/

    Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Jacob P. Freeman (Fennemore).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights ContractClaims StateLawClaims RemediesDamages WashingtonNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use