Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—9th Cir.: $7.8M jury verdict upheld in favor of former BART employees who objected to COVID-vax mandate
    • ARBITRATION—S.D.N.Y.: Court holds EFAA bars arbitration of entire employment suit based on plausibly pleaded sexual harassment claim
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—9th Cir.: Absolute immunity does not extend to tribal officers being sued in their individual capacity
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—N.D. Ala.: Successor liability claim survives as court finds evidence of continuity between trucking businesses
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—S.D. Ga.: Property manager’s race bias, retaliation claims advance over disputed performance-based firing
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Does California employment law follow workers across state lines? Key frameworks and the latest from the California Court of Appeal in Saberin v. Alation, Inc.
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New York State mandates employee access to personnel records
    • LABOR NEWS—CWA workers secure contracts, recognition, election victory
    • LABOR—ORGANIZING, ELECTIONS—NLRB: Employer granted review of revocation of subpoena’s seeking union communications
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Court temporarily blocks use of federal service hiring question asking applicants about Trump priorities
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Multistate coalition settles AmeriCorps lawsuit, securing funding and notice protections through FY 2026-27
    • REPORTS—GAO finds oversight gaps in Defense Department support agreements
    • RETALIATION—N.D.N.Y.: Car salesman’s retaliation claims head to trial amid dispute over reason for his termination
    • RETALIATION—S.D. Ohio: Lion’s Den retail chain defeats transgender worker’s Title VII claims over firing
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—New York State mandates employee access to personnel records, (Sep 14, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Proskauer
    Organizations Mentioned:Proskauer Rose, LLP

    By Evandro Gigante and Laura Fant of Proskauer Rose LLP

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed into law a bill that will provide private and public sector employees and former employees a right to access and dispute their personnel records. It takes effect on November 8, 2026 (60 days following signing ...

    By Evandro Gigante and Laura Fant of Proskauer Rose LLP

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed into law a bill that will provide private and public sector employees and former employees a right to access and dispute their personnel records. It takes effect on November 8, 2026 (60 days following signing of the bill on September 9).

    S3460 adds new Section 210-b to the New York Labor Law and will require employers to:

    1. notify an employee within 10 days of the employer placing in the employee's personnel record "any information to the extent that the information is, has been used or may be used, to negatively affect the employee's qualification for employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation or the possibility that the employee will be subject to disciplinary action";

    2. provide a free copy of the employee's personnel record within five (5) business days after receiving a written request from an employee or former employee;

    3. permit employees at least two (2) reviews of their personnel record per calendar year, with reviews prompted by newly added negative information not counting toward that limit; and

    4. generally retain the complete personnel record throughout employment and for three (3) years following termination.

    The bill defines "personnel record" as a record kept by an employer (or a third-party contracted agent) that "identifies an employee, to the extent that the record is used or has been used, or may affect or be used relative to that employee's qualifications for employment, promotion, transfer, additional compensation or disciplinary action." It includes:

    • The employee's name, address and date of birth;

    • Job title and description;

    • Rate of pay and any other compensation paid to the employee;

    • Starting date of employment and dated termination notices;

    • Job application and resumes;

    • Waivers signed by the employee;

    • Employee performance evaluations and evaluation documents;

    • Written warnings of substandard performance;

    • Probationary periods; and

    • Any other documents related to disciplinary action.

    It does not, however, include information of a personal nature about a person other than the employee if disclosure of the information would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of such other person's privacy.

    If an employee disputes information in the personnel record, the parties may mutually agree to correct or remove it. If they do not agree, the employee may submit a written statement explaining the employee's position, which must be made part of the record. The bill also provides mechanisms for seeking expungement of information the employer knew or should have known was false, as well as protections against retaliation for employees exercising their rights under the law.

    The law does not supersede the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, provided that such agreement provides at least substantially similar access by an employee to their personnel record as required by the law.

    The law will be enforced by the New York State Attorney General, with violations punishable by fines ranging from $500 to $2,500.

    With this new law, New York joins a number of other states with laws enabling current and former employees to access their personnel records, including Massachusetts' Personnel Record Law, upon which the NY law was modeled.

    Employers should begin taking steps to ensure compliance with the new law, including ensuring mechanisms for timely access to personnel records.

    New York State Mandates Employee Access To Personnel Records

    Evandro Gigante and Laura Fant

    Proskauer Rose LLP

    Eleven Times Square

    (Eighth Avenue & 41st Street)

    New York

    10036-8299

    United States

    Tel.: +1 212 9693000

    E-mail: gpolk@proskauer.com

    URL: www.proskauer.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Proskauer).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights PracticeTip StateLegislation StateLawClaims Privacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use