Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—1st Cir.: Preliminary injunction halting layoffs at three federal agencies allowed to stand
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—S.D. Ohio: Office employee, who allegedly quit due to manager’s anti-lactation harassment, states a myriad of claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—6th Cir.: LPN’s request to be exempt from COVID-19 vaccine and weekly testing posed undue hardship
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—S.D. Ind.: Gay employee’s HWE claim proceeds against assisted living facility
    • EEOC NEWS—Agency recovers $20K, files new suit against employers that allegedly took adverse actions despite medical clearance
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Jersey expands captive audience prohibition to meetings about unionization
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—State Department tightens rules for visa applicant interviews: what employers should know and do next
    • HOUSE NEWS—Bipartisan ‘American Franchise Act’ seeks to nail down narrower test for franchisor liability
    • HOUSE NEWS—Chairman of Education and Workforce Committee’s HELP subcommittee accuses unions of antisemitic behavior in hearing
    • LABOR PULSE—Why Uncle Herschel got his job back
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit alleges FBI officials were terminated for participating in Trump investigations
    • PROCEDURE—M.D. Ala.: Acting Labor Secretary had standing to pursue child labor claims against Hyundai and parts supplier
    • VITAL BRIEFING—European majority feel humiliated by Trump tariffs according to survey
    • WAGE-HOUR—N.D. Ala.: Former UPS employee, denied Saturday work, failed to establish FLSA retaliation
    • WORTH NOTING—Recent developments involving religious discrimination
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—New Jersey expands captive audience prohibition to meetings about unionization, (Sep 12, 2025)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Ballard Spahr
    Organizations Mentioned:Ballard Spahr, LLP | Labor Relations

    By Denise Keyser and Karli Lubin of Ballard Spahr LLP

    On September 3, 2025, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed legislation prohibiting employers from mandating employee participation in communications about the decision to join or support a labor organization or association. The measure expands New ...

    By Denise Keyser and Karli Lubin of Ballard Spahr LLP

    On September 3, 2025, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed legislation prohibiting employers from mandating employee participation in communications about the decision to join or support a labor organization or association. The measure expands New Jersey's existing restrictions on these "captive audience" meetings related to political and religious matters and joins several other states, including California, New York, Illinois, and Washington, that ban employers from requiring attendance at meetings about religious, political, or labor organization issues. New Jersey's law does not prohibit employers from conducting union avoidance meetings so long as such meetings are voluntary and employees are informed that they may refuse to attend a meeting without penalty.

    New Jersey's prohibition is consistent with the Biden-era National Labor Relations Board decision in Amazon.com Services LLC,373 NLRB No. 136(Nov. 13, 2024), holding that employers may not require employees to attend meetings during work hours to listen to their employer's views about unions, unless certain safe harbor requirements are met. Until the Amazon decision, the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") had been interpreted to permit mandatory captive audience meetings concerning the employer's position on unionization.

    The Board has lacked a quorum since January 2025, but, if recent senate nominations are confirmed, we expect to see reversals of many Biden-era union-friendly NLRB decisions including Amazon.com Services LLC.

    And, we may see legal challenges to New Jersey's newly expanded prohibitions, as the captive audience laws of several other states have faced legal challenges, including claims that these laws are pre-empted by the National Labor Relations Act.

    Ballard Spahr's Labor & Employment Group routinely assists employers in ensuring compliance with other state, federal, and local statutes and regulations and regularly assists clients in updating their policies and practices to be compliant with recent developments.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Denise Keyser and Karli Lubin

    Ballard Spahr LLP

    1735 Market St 51st floor

    Philadelphia

    PA 19103

    United States

    Tel.: +1 215 6658500

    E-mail: fujimotoc@ballardspahr.com

    URL: www.ballardspahr.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2025 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Ballard Spahr).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights Labor UnfairLaborPractices IndividualRights StateLawClaims AgencyNews NewJerseyNews PracticeTip

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use