Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • OPM NEWS—Memo provides guidance to agencies on implementation of ‘biological truth’ executive order
    • DISCRIMINATION—8th Cir.: Acting manager, denied promotion by FAA, cannot revive discrimination, retaliation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—8th Cir.: EEOC verdict in favor of deaf trucker upheld
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—N.D. Ind.: Employee’s failure to report supervisor’s sexual remarks bolstered Faragher-Ellerth defense
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers pay $1M for religious, disability discrimination; subpoena enforcement action announced
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—How could the lower courts' loss of nationwide injunction power impact your business?
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Lessons from the Seventh Circuit on relying on FMLA certifications and requiring the use of paid leave
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—Another district court blocks birthright citizenship EO, stays preliminary injunction for seven days pending appeal
    • NLRB NEWS—In advice memo, NLRB instructs regions to follow Bethany College, says Edward Waters University is religious institution
    • PROCEDURE—8th Cir.: Black employee’s disparate treatment, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims against VA proceed
    • PROCEDURE—8th Cir.: Plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge project labor agreements required by Minnesota municipalities
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D. Haw.: Public Health Service employee not entitled to removal to federal court in cybersecurity lawsuit
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Trump postpones trading partners’ day of reckoning, again
    • WAGE-HOUR—Conn. App.: Connecticut appellate court denies relief for restaurant servers in tip credit case
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Employers pay $1M for religious, disability discrimination; subpoena enforcement action announced, (Jul 11, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Daniel Food Enterprises, Inc. | Everport Terminal Services | Gonzalez Food Enterprises, Inc. | Jalos Food Enterprises, Inc. | Joya Food Enterprises, Inc. | Port of Oakland | Santa Isabel Enterprises, Inc. | Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. | Vallarta Supermarkets | Venetian Las Vegas Gaming, LLC | Venetian Las Vegas Marketing, Inc. | Venetian Resort Las Vegas | Zixta Enterprises, Inc.

    By Jonathan Anderson

    The subpoena stems from allegations that the employer failed or refused to recruit, hire, or promote non-Hispanic individuals because of their race and national origin.

    Two employers in Nevada and California collectively paid $1,050,000 to resolve all ...

    By Jonathan Anderson

    The subpoena stems from allegations that the employer failed or refused to recruit, hire, or promote non-Hispanic individuals because of their race and national origin.

    Two employers in Nevada and California collectively paid $1,050,000 to resolve allegations by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that the employers violated Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In addition to providing monetary relief to affected employees, the employers agreed to make changes to their policies, procedures, and training to avoid future discrimination. Separately, the EEOC also announced legal action to enforce a subpoena against a California employer as part of an investigation into claims of illegal hiring practices.

    Religious discrimination and retaliation. The Venetian Resort Las Vegas, a hotel and casino resort on the Las Vegas Strip, will pay $850,000 and provide other relief to settle a Title VII religious discrimination and retaliation lawsuit filed by the EEOC. The lawsuit alleged that the Venetian Resort refused to accommodate the sincerely held religious beliefs of a class of employees, which included a diversity of faiths as outlined in the complaint. The suit further alleged that the Venetian retaliated against employees who opposed these acts of religious discrimination. In some cases, the denial of accommodations led to discipline, denial of promotion opportunities, and discharge or constructive discharge, according to the complaint.

    In addition to monetary relief, a three-year consent decree settling the suit provides for training of all Venetian employees, managers, and supervisors on employee rights and employers’ obligations regarding religious accommodations under Title VII. The decree also requires that the Venetian retain a third-party, independent monitor to assist with review and revision of its religious accommodation policies and complaint procedures, and the tracking of the Venetian’s compliance for the 36 months it is under the consent decree. The hotel is owned and operated by Venetian Las Vegas Gaming, LLC and Venetian Las Vegas Marketing, Inc.

    The EEOC filed its lawsuit in the District of Nevada; the case is No. 2:25-cv-01148.

    Disability discrimination. Everport Terminal Services (ETS) entered into a $200,000 conciliation agreement with the EEOC, which had alleged the employer failed to provide a reasonable accommodation to a worker with a disability in violation of the ADA. ETS operates a terminal at the Port of Oakland, California. When the worker, a “steady” longshoreman mechanic, showed up to work in person to accept a light duty position, his supervisor denied there was available work suitable for the worker’s restrictions and sent him home, according to the EEOC. Following an investigation, the parties engaged in the pre-litigation conciliation process, resulting in a settlement requiring ETS to provide back pay and compensatory damages; revise its non-discrimination policies and procedures; conduct training for all California employees, managers, and human resources personnel; post a notice concerning equal employment opportunity rights in English and Spanish; track all accommodation requests; and report to the agency for two years.

    Subpoena enforcement. The EEOC said it is seeking to enforce a subpoena issued during an investigation into claims of illegal hiring practices by Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. and related companies, dba Vallarta Supermarkets, in Central and Southern California. Vallarta Supermarkets is a supermarket chain with approximately 80 locations throughout Central and Southern California, and a corporate office located in Sylmar, California. The related companies in this case are Gonzalez Food Enterprises, Inc., Daniel Food Enterprises, Inc., Jalos Food Enterprises, Inc., Joya Food Enterprises, Inc., Santa Isabel Enterprises, Inc., and Zixta Enterprises, Inc.

    The EEOC’s charges allege that the company has failed or refused to recruit, hire, or promote non-Hispanic individuals because of their race (white, black, and/or Asian) and national origin (non-Hispanic). Such hiring practices may be illegal under Title VII. As part of its investigation, the federal agency issued a subpoena requesting information including applicant and employee data, screening questions used during the hiring process, job descriptions, race and national origin complaints, and any demographic data obtained for either applicants or employees and contact information.

    The EEOC filed the action in the Central District of California; the case is No. 2:25-mc-00058.

    Companies: Venetian Resort Las Vegas; Venetian Las Vegas Gaming, LLC; Venetian Las Vegas Marketing, Inc.; Everport Terminal Services; Vallarta Supermarkets; Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.; Gonzalez Food Enterprises, Inc.; Daniel Food Enterprises, Inc.; Jalos Food Enterprises, Inc.; Joya Food Enterprises, Inc.; Santa Isabel Enterprises, Inc.; Zixta Enterprises, Inc.

    News: AgencyNews Discrimination NationalOrigin RaceDiscrimination DisabilityDiscrimination ReligiousDiscrimination Retaliation LitigationNewsTrends RemediesDamages

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use