Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: FTC increases some civil penalties based on inflation
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Art gallery alleges restraint of trade by foundation’s refusal to confirm art work’s authenticity
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Automobile parts manufacturer Aisan sentenced in price fixing probe
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC investigating Huntsman’s acquisition of the titanium dioxide assets of Rockwood
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Michigan files charges against energy firms for price fixing of oil and gas leases
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Plea agreement will end U.S. case against former airline fuel supply service company owner
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Antitrust claims stayed in light of validity and infringement claims filed in another jurisdiction
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Home security company ADT settles FTC charges of deceptive endorsements
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Ninth Circuit’s rejection of damage award based on defendants’ gain rather than consumers’ loss in FTC case is subject of Supreme Court petition
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D.N.J.: Urgent care franchisees could not state constructive termination claims
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Advertising and media attorney Jesse Brody joins Manatt in Los Angeles
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Former FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director among new EPIC advisory board members
    • RICO—5th Cir.: Dismissal of land recording clerks’ claims based on alleged violations of Trust Indenture Act against mortgage companies upheld
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D.N.Y.: State-law claims against overdraft fee charges not preempted by National Bank Act
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Home security company ADT settles FTC charges of deceptive endorsements, (Mar 6, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:ADT LLC | ADT, LLC

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    Home security company ADT LLC has agreed to refrain from misrepresenting paid endorsements as independent reviews to settle FTC charges that it misrepresented that reviews were independent and failed to disclose that the experts were being paid to pr ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    Home security company ADT LLC has agreed to refrain from misrepresenting paid endorsements as independent reviews to settle FTC charges that it misrepresented that reviews were independent and failed to disclose that the experts were being paid to promote its products (In the Matter of ADT LLC, File No. 122-3121).

    Based in Boca Raton, Florida, ADT manufactures and markets the ADT Pulse home security and monitoring system and various other security products and services. The FTC’s administrative complaint alleges that ADT paid spokespersons to demonstrate and review the ADT Pulse on television radio news programs and talk shows across the country, and in blogs and other online material. ADT, the FTC alleges, misrepresented that the reviews were independent, and failed to disclose that the experts were being paid by ADT to promote the Pulse system.

    The proposed consent order (1) prohibits ADT from misrepresenting that any discussion or demonstration of a security or monitoring product or service is an independent review provided by an impartial expert; (2) requires ADT to clearly and prominently disclose, in connection with the advertising of a home security or monitoring product or service, a material connection, if one exists, between an endorser and the company; and (3) requires the company to promptly remove reviews and endorsements that have been misrepresented as independently provided by an impartial expert or that fail to disclose a material connection between ADT and an endorser. The settlement agreement will be subject to public comment through April 7, 2014.

    “It’s hard for consumers to make good buying decisions when they think they’re getting independent expert advice as part of an impartial news segment and have no way of knowing they are actually watching a sales pitch,” said FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Jessica Rich. “When a paid endorser appears in a news or talk show segment with the host of that program, the relationship with the advertiser must be clearly disclosed.”

    Companies: ADT LLC

    News: Advertising ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use