Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: FTC increases some civil penalties based on inflation
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Art gallery alleges restraint of trade by foundation’s refusal to confirm art work’s authenticity
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Automobile parts manufacturer Aisan sentenced in price fixing probe
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC investigating Huntsman’s acquisition of the titanium dioxide assets of Rockwood
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Michigan files charges against energy firms for price fixing of oil and gas leases
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Plea agreement will end U.S. case against former airline fuel supply service company owner
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Antitrust claims stayed in light of validity and infringement claims filed in another jurisdiction
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Home security company ADT settles FTC charges of deceptive endorsements
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Ninth Circuit’s rejection of damage award based on defendants’ gain rather than consumers’ loss in FTC case is subject of Supreme Court petition
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D.N.J.: Urgent care franchisees could not state constructive termination claims
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Advertising and media attorney Jesse Brody joins Manatt in Los Angeles
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Former FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director among new EPIC advisory board members
    • RICO—5th Cir.: Dismissal of land recording clerks’ claims based on alleged violations of Trust Indenture Act against mortgage companies upheld
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D.N.Y.: State-law claims against overdraft fee charges not preempted by National Bank Act
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Michigan files charges against energy firms for price fixing of oil and gas leases, (Mar 6, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Chesapeake Energy Corp. | Chesapeake Energy Corporation | Encana Oil and Gas USA

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has announced the filing of criminal charges by his Corporate Oversight Division against Oklahoma-based Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Delaware-based Encana Oil and Gas USA for their alleged collaboration in ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has announced the filing of criminal charges by his Corporate Oversight Division against Oklahoma-based Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Delaware-based Encana Oil and Gas USA for their alleged collaboration in 2010 to avoid bidding against each other in Michigan public auctions and private negotiations for oil and gas leases that caused prices to drop dramatically.

    Public auctions of state-held oil and gas leases are held twice yearly, once in May and once in October, by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR). During the DNR’s May 2010 auction, both Chesapeake and Encana purchased natural gas leases in Michigan. In 2012, a news agency uncovered a possible conspiracy between the two companies’ executives who discussed an agreement following the May 2010 auction to allocate Michigan counties where each company would be an exclusive bidder for both public and private leases.

    In the five month period following the state’s May 2010 auction, the alleged conspiracy may have been a key driver behind the state-held lease price in Michigan going from $1,510 per acre in May 2010 to less than $40 an acre at the October 2010 auction.

    Schuette filed the following charges against Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Encana Oil and Gas USA on March 5, 2014: (1) one count each of antitrust violations relating to a contract or conspiracy in restraint of commerce, a high court misdemeanor punishable by up to two years and/or $10,000 fine for an individual or up to $1,000,000 for a corporation; and (2) one count each of attempted antitrust violations, a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year and/or $1,000 fine. Representatives from both Chesapeake and Encana are scheduled to be arraigned on March 19, 2014 before Cheboygan County’s 89th District Court.

    “I will aggressively prosecute any company who conspires to break the law,” said Attorrney General Schuette.

    Companies: Chesapeake Energy Corporation; Encana Oil and Gas USA

    News: Antitrust MichiganNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use