Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—S.D. Fla.: Pharmaceutical maker unable to avoid allegations over acquisition
    • ADVERTISING—S.D. Cal.: Chef Boyardee learns to read, ‘No MSG’ means ‘No MSG’
    • AGENCY NEWS: MIT economist named deputy assistant attorney general at Antitrust Division
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Executive pleads guilty for role in international automobile parts cartel
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Tour operators alleged to have boycotted competitor
    • ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: Jurisdiction for 612 customers exists in action over anti-anxiety drug pricing
    • ANTITRUST—E.D. Pa.: Hospital’s claims against surgical products distributors cut back
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Assets of operation sending unordered merchandise to nonprofits frozen
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Commissioner McSweeny updates Congress on mobile cramming issues
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Hidden assets trigger imposition of $26 million FTC Act judgment
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS—Lawmakers react to NLRB General Counsel’s view that McDonald’s is a joint employer
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Rich Greenstein to chair DLA Piper’s US Franchise and Distribution practice
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Third Circuit takes Wyndham's appeal in FTC action
    • RICO—N.D. Cal.: Former employee sufficiently alleges loss from company’s money laundering
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Commissioner McSweeny updates Congress on mobile cramming issues, (Jul 31, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:T-Mobile USA, Inc.

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny testified before Congress yesterday on the Commission’s efforts to stop mobile cramming. In prepared remarks, “Cramming on Wireless Phone Bills: A Review of Consumer Protection Practices and Gaps,ȁ ...

    By Greg Hammond, J.D.

    FTC Commissioner Terrell McSweeny testified before Congress yesterday on the Commission’s efforts to stop mobile cramming. In prepared remarks, “Cramming on Wireless Phone Bills: A Review of Consumer Protection Practices and Gaps,” McSweeny informed the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee that mobile cramming—the act of placing unauthorized third-party charges on mobile phone accounts—remains a significant consumer protection issue in the United States.

    “Mobile cramming is a significant problem that threatens to undermine confidence in the developing payment method known generally as ‘carrier’ billing, which offers consumers the opportunity to charge goods and services to their mobile phone accounts,” according to the testimony. “As carrier billing has developed, however, fraud has become a significant problem for consumers.”

    Enforcement. Since 2013, the FTC has brought five mobile cramming cases against merchants that resulted in substantial monetary judgments. The most notable judgment was reached in June against Tatto, Inc., in which the company ran deceptive web advertisements that promised consumers the chance to win prizes in return for their mobile phone numbers. Consumers did not receive any prizes, but were signed up for the company’s subscription plans. Tatto agreed to a partially suspended judgment of over $150 million.

    More recently, the Commission filed its first mobile cramming action against a telecommunications company—T-Mobile USA, Inc. The FTC alleged that T-Mobile unlawfully charged consumers for unauthorized monthly text message subscriptions offered by third-party merchants, and deceptively described the charges under the general term “Use Charges.”

    “These actions all reinforce the basic principle that a company must obtain a consumer’s express, informed consent before placing charges on their bills—which applies to the mobile environment just as it does to brick-and-mortar companies.”

    Best practices. In response to the growing mobile cramming issue, the Commission made a number of best practice recommendations to the Senate Committee, including: (1) mobile providers should give consumers the option to block third-party charges from their mobile phone accounts, or to block some or all providers; (2) consumers should be adequately informed of all third-party charges on their accounts; and (3) mobile carriers should provide customers with a clear and consistent process to dispute suspicious charges on their mobile accounts and to obtain reimbursement.

    Companies: T-Mobile USA, Inc.

    News: ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use