Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary, (Sep 4, 2014)

The week’s most insightful, intriguing, or entertaining blog posts regarding antitrust and trade regulation issues:

• Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog, “Do ‘Reverse Payment’ Settlements of Brand-Generic Patent Disputes in the Pharmaceutical Industry Constitute an Anticompetitive Pay for Delay?” by D. Daniel Sokol (University of Florida Levin College of Law)

• The Antitrust Attorney Blog, “Five U.S. Antitrust Law Tips for Foreign Companies,” by Jarod Bona

• Antitrust Update, “Direct Evidence of Patent Holder’s Pricing Power Doesn’t Lead to Summary Judgment on Existence of Monopoly Power,” by Thomas W. Pippert and Vivian Storm

• FTC Business Center Blog, “4 tips businesses can take from the FTC’s $19+ million Google settlement,” by Lesley Fair

• Truth on the Market, “Intellectual Property, Innovation and Economic Growth: Mercatus Gets It Wrong,” by Mark Schultz and Adam Mossoff

• The Washington Post, “A lot of people don’t like the Comcast-Time Warner merger, but that doesn’t mean it won’t be approved,” by Cecilia Kang

• Ad Law Access, “FTC Asks (Too?) Much of Retailers,” by Katie Bond and Megan L. Olsen

• Franchise Law Update, “Vicarious Liability: Can We Breathe a Sigh of Relief after Patterson? (No)” by John Gotaskie

Have you seen (or written) a blog post that fits the bill? Send a note to ALD@wolterskluwer.com, with a link to the suggested post.

Attorneys: Jarod Bona (Bona Law PC); Thomas W. Pippert and Vivian Storm (Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP); Katie Bond and Megan L. Olsen (Kelley Drye & Warren); John Gotaskie (Fox Rothschild LLP)

News: Advertising Antitrust FranchisingDistribution