Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—7th Cir.: Dismissal of Sherman Act claims for purchases made by foreign affiliates of domestic company upheld
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Ill.: False advertising claim against ice machine manufacturer barred
    • ADVERTISING—ND Cal.: Medical device manufacturer not liable for implying that its product was FDA approved for certain uses
    • AGENCY NEWS: Bureau directors provide updates on FTC accomplishments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Agency heads tout enforcement records at ABA Spring Meeting
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust Division announces new streamlined procedure for modifying/terminating old settlements and judgments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC files complaint against two propane exchange tank suppliers for restraining competition
    • ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Dismissal reversed for claims of manipulation of LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate mortgage loans
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: CRT manufacturers in price-fixing action not compelled to produce a confidential European Commission investigation decision
    • CONFERENCES: IFA Legal Symposium set for May 4-6 in Chicago
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—11th Cir.: Preliminary injunction, asset freeze upheld in FTC action against health insurance operation
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Fandango, Credit Karma settle FTC charges of misrepresenting security of mobile apps
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App. Ct.: UCL derivative suit dismissed for failure to show competitor statements were unfair, fraudulent acts
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC files complaint against two propane exchange tank suppliers for restraining competition, (Mar 28, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:AmeriGas Partners, L.P. | AmeriGas Partners, LP | Amerigas Propane, Inc. | Bureau of Competition | Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. | Ferrellgas Partners, LP | Ferrellgas, LP | UGI Corp. PA | UGI Corporation | Walmart

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC announced yesterday that it has issued an administrative complaint against Ferrellgas Partners, L.P and Ferrellgas, L.P. (doing business as Blue Rhino) and UGI Corporation and AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (doing business as AmeriGas Cylinder Excha ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC announced yesterday that it has issued an administrative complaint against Ferrellgas Partners, L.P and Ferrellgas, L.P. (doing business as Blue Rhino) and UGI Corporation and AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (doing business as AmeriGas Cylinder Exchange), alleging that they illegally coordinated to reduce the amount of propane in their tanks sold to a key customer.

    The complaint alleges that Blue Rhino and AmeriGas together controlled approximately 80 percent of the market for wholesale propane exchange tanks in the United States. In 2008, Blue Rhino and AmeriGas each decided to implement a price increase by reducing the amount of propane in their exchange tanks from 17 pounds to 15 pounds, without a corresponding reduction in the wholesale price.

    Walmart, which purchased tanks from both Blue Rhino and AmeriGas, refused to accept the fill reduction. Due to the resistance from Walmart, Blue Rhino and AmeriGas colluded by secretly agreeing that neither would deviate from their proposal to reduce the fill level to Walmart. For a period of several months, sales executives from the two propane companies communicated repeatedly by telephone and email to apprise each other of the status of their discussions with Walmart and to work together to take the steps necessary to push Walmart to promptly accept the fill reduction. The secret agreement between Blue Rhino and AmeriGas had the effect of raising the price per pound of propane to Walmart, and likely to the ultimate consumers.

    Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., is a limited partnership based in Overland Park, Kansas, that conducts its business activities mostly through Ferrellgas, L.P. Ferrellgas, L.P operates a national propane distribution business, and owns or has access to distribution locations across the United States. Its businesses include filling, refilling, refurbishing, selling, and distributing propane exchange tanks.

    UGI Corporation, which is headquartered in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, is the parent and sole owner of AmeriGas Propane, Inc., which is the general partner of AmeriGas Partners, L.P.

    AmeriGas Partners, L.P. is a limited partnership also based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. It operates a nationwide propane business through its subsidiary AmeriGas Propane, L.P., which markets and sells propane and propane-related services, including distributing and supplying bulk propane to residential, commercial, and agricultural customers, as well as filling, distributing, marketing, and selling propane exchange tanks.

    “This type of collusion may not be direct or visible to consumers, but can lead to higher prices or lower quality,” said Deborah Feinstein, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “So companies should be on notice that when we see this type of conduct, we will take action to stop it.”

    The Commission vote approving the administrative complaint was 3-1, with Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen voting no.

    Companies: Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.; UGI Corporation; AmeriGas Partners, L.P.

    News: Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use