Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—7th Cir.: Dismissal of Sherman Act claims for purchases made by foreign affiliates of domestic company upheld
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Ill.: False advertising claim against ice machine manufacturer barred
    • ADVERTISING—ND Cal.: Medical device manufacturer not liable for implying that its product was FDA approved for certain uses
    • AGENCY NEWS: Bureau directors provide updates on FTC accomplishments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Agency heads tout enforcement records at ABA Spring Meeting
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust Division announces new streamlined procedure for modifying/terminating old settlements and judgments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC files complaint against two propane exchange tank suppliers for restraining competition
    • ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Dismissal reversed for claims of manipulation of LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate mortgage loans
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: CRT manufacturers in price-fixing action not compelled to produce a confidential European Commission investigation decision
    • CONFERENCES: IFA Legal Symposium set for May 4-6 in Chicago
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—11th Cir.: Preliminary injunction, asset freeze upheld in FTC action against health insurance operation
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Fandango, Credit Karma settle FTC charges of misrepresenting security of mobile apps
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App. Ct.: UCL derivative suit dismissed for failure to show competitor statements were unfair, fraudulent acts
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust Division announces new streamlined procedure for modifying/terminating old settlements and judgments, (Mar 28, 2014)

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The Department of Justice Antitrust Division announced today a new streamlined procedure that will lower the costs and expedite the review process for parties seeking to modify or terminate old antitrust settlements and litigated judgments.

    The new vo ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    The Department of Justice Antitrust Division announced today a new streamlined procedure that will lower the costs and expedite the review process for parties seeking to modify or terminate old antitrust settlements and litigated judgments.

    The new voluntary procedure, which is effective immediately, updates a 1999 protocol. The expedited process can be used by parties seeking to modify or terminate perpetual decrees entered before 1980. The updated procedure can be found in the Division Manual under “Judgment Modifications and Terminations.”

    In 1979, the department determined that entering into perpetual decrees was not in the public interest. Since that time, decrees have included “sunset” provisions that will automatically terminate them after a term, not to exceed 10 years. Most decrees entered into before 1980 do not contain this provision.

    Pre-1980 perpetual decrees cannot be terminated or modified except by court order. Since 1980, there have been significant changes in markets and technology and substantial changes in antitrust law. Going forward, the department will advise courts that pre-1980 “legacy” decrees, except in limited circumstances, are presumptively no longer in the public interest. Those limited circumstances may include when there is a long-standing reliance by industry participants on the decree.

    The updated procedure differs from the present procedure in two ways. First, the party seeking termination or modification will no longer be subject to the extensive discovery that was required by the 1999 protocol. This should result in a substantial reduction in the cost of seeking decree termination. Second, when responding to a request to terminate or modify qualifying legacy decrees, the department will no longer conduct an in-depth investigation into the relevant markets due to the significant changes that have taken place.

    Under the procedure, the requesting party will publish, at its own expense, notice of its intent to seek termination or modification and invite interested parties to provide the Antitrust Division with relevant information. The division will work with the requesting party to determine what form of cost-effective notice is appropriate. Because the process is expedited, a pre-filing public comment period best serves the public interest by allowing interested parties to come forward early in the process so that their concerns may be considered and addressed prior to the filing of a motion to modify or terminate. Other parts of the 1999 protocol will remain in effect.

    “The new streamlined procedure will expedite the review process for legacy decrees and will benefit both the defendants and the department by eliminating costly and time intensive investigations,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “The Antitrust Division will continue to look for ways to incorporate procedural efficiencies whenever possible as it is an important part of effective antitrust enforcement.”

    News: Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use