Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—7th Cir.: Dismissal of Sherman Act claims for purchases made by foreign affiliates of domestic company upheld
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Ill.: False advertising claim against ice machine manufacturer barred
    • ADVERTISING—ND Cal.: Medical device manufacturer not liable for implying that its product was FDA approved for certain uses
    • AGENCY NEWS: Bureau directors provide updates on FTC accomplishments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Agency heads tout enforcement records at ABA Spring Meeting
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust Division announces new streamlined procedure for modifying/terminating old settlements and judgments
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC files complaint against two propane exchange tank suppliers for restraining competition
    • ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Dismissal reversed for claims of manipulation of LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate mortgage loans
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: CRT manufacturers in price-fixing action not compelled to produce a confidential European Commission investigation decision
    • CONFERENCES: IFA Legal Symposium set for May 4-6 in Chicago
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—11th Cir.: Preliminary injunction, asset freeze upheld in FTC action against health insurance operation
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Fandango, Credit Karma settle FTC charges of misrepresenting security of mobile apps
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App. Ct.: UCL derivative suit dismissed for failure to show competitor statements were unfair, fraudulent acts
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST—9th Cir.: Dismissal reversed for claims of manipulation of LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate mortgage loans, (Mar 28, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Houser & Allison, APC | Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Barclays Bank PLC | Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. | Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP | Western Progressive, LLC

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco has reversed a lower court’s dismissal of LIBOR manipulation claims against certain lenders in connection with adjustable-rate mortgage loans (Galope v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, March 27, ...

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco has reversed a lower court’s dismissal of LIBOR manipulation claims against certain lenders in connection with adjustable-rate mortgage loans (Galope v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, March 27, 2014, Per Curiam).

    Helen Galope brought an action in federal district court, on behalf of herself and similarly situated individuals, against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as trustee (DBNTC), Barclays Bank and others, alleging antitrust and state unfair trade practices violations in connection with her mortgage loan containing an adjustable rate based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Since March 2011, regulators in the United States and various other countries have conducted ongoing investigations into alleged LIBOR manipulation.

    After the lower court dismissed her claims, ruling that Galope failed to establish the injury-in-fact required for Article III standing, she appealed. The appellate court reversed in part and affirmed in part.

    Standing. Galope adequately alleged that she would not have purchased her loan had she known that the defendants were manipulating the LIBOR rate, the appellate court stated. Further, her standing did not depend on whether she actually made interest payments that were adjusted in response to the allegedly manipulated LIBOR rate. Therefore, the appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings Galope’s claims against Barclays Bank. However, the court affirmed the dismissal of DBNTC, finding that Galope had failed to present any evidence that DBNTC was involved in the alleged LIBOR manipulation.

    The case is Civil Action No. 12-56892.

    Attorneys: Lenore Albert for Helen Galope. Eric D. Houser (Houser & Allison, APC) for Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. and Western Progressive, LLC. David Harold Braff (Sullivan & Cromwell LLP) for Barclays Bank PLC.

    Companies: Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.; Western Progressive, LLC; Barclays Bank PLC

    Cases: Antitrust StateUnfairTradePractices AlaskaNews ArizonaNews CaliforniaNews HawaiiNews IdahoNews MontanaNews NevadaNews OregonNews WashingtonNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use