Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—N.D. Cal.: Upcoming trial in TFT-LCD case set to proceed with Kodak's claims against AU Optronics, Best Buy's claims against Toshiba
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Automobile dealers allege conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids for automotive lamps
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EU dismisses appeals of five companies of fines imposed for their participation in a cartel on the international removals market
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: European Commission performed unannounced inspections of telecommunications companies
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: European Commission requests comments on proposal for assessing minor agreements between companies
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC approves modified order resolving challenge to Hertz/Dollar Thirty combination
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Australian competition prosecutor rejoins Perkins Coie
    • RICO—W.D. Pa.: Oil contractor fails to state RICO claims against subcontractor over alleged kickback scheme
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D.N.Y.: Consolidated deceptive labeling claims best resolved by transferor courts
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: California deceptive labeling action transferred to New York district court under first-to-file rule
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Ill.: Non-Illinois residents could not bring claims in Illinois for deceptive business practices
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: European Commission performed unannounced inspections of telecommunications companies, (Jul 11, 2013)

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    The European Commission has confirmed that on July 9, 2013, Commission officials initiated unannounced inspections at the premises of a number of telecommunications companies active in the provision of Internet connectivity in several Member States. ...

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    The European Commission has confirmed that on July 9, 2013, Commission officials initiated unannounced inspections at the premises of a number of telecommunications companies active in the provision of Internet connectivity in several Member States. The inspections were prompted by the Commission’s concerns that the companies may have violated EU antitrust rules that prohibit the abuse of a dominant market position (Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - TFEU).

    Unannounced inspections are a preliminary step in an investigation into suspected anticompetitive practices, according to the Commission. The Commission officials were accompanied by their counterparts from the relevant national competition authorities.

    Internet players interconnect with each other through a combination of wholesale services to cover all possible Internet destinations. Internet connectivity allows market players (e.g. content providers) to connect to the Internet so as to be able to provide their services or products at the retail level. This service is crucial for the functioning of the Internet and for end users' ability to reach Internet content with the necessary quality of service, irrespective of the location of the provider.

    The fact that the Commission carries out such inspections does not mean that the companies are guilty of anti-competitive behavior nor does it prejudge the outcome of the investigation itself, the Commission noted. The Commission respects the rights of defense, in particular the right of companies to be heard in antitrust proceedings. The Commission does not make public the names of the companies inspected at this stage.

    The Commission explained that there is no legal deadline to complete inquiries into anticompetitive conduct. Their duration depends on a number of factors, including the complexity of each case, the extent to which the undertakings concerned co-operate with the Commission and the exercise of the rights of defense.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use