Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—N.D. Cal.: Upcoming trial in TFT-LCD case set to proceed with Kodak's claims against AU Optronics, Best Buy's claims against Toshiba
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Automobile dealers allege conspiracy to fix prices and rig bids for automotive lamps
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EU dismisses appeals of five companies of fines imposed for their participation in a cartel on the international removals market
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: European Commission performed unannounced inspections of telecommunications companies
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: European Commission requests comments on proposal for assessing minor agreements between companies
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC approves modified order resolving challenge to Hertz/Dollar Thirty combination
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Australian competition prosecutor rejoins Perkins Coie
    • RICO—W.D. Pa.: Oil contractor fails to state RICO claims against subcontractor over alleged kickback scheme
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D.N.Y.: Consolidated deceptive labeling claims best resolved by transferor courts
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: California deceptive labeling action transferred to New York district court under first-to-file rule
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Ill.: Non-Illinois residents could not bring claims in Illinois for deceptive business practices
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: EU dismisses appeals of five companies of fines imposed for their participation in a cartel on the international removals market, (Jul 11, 2013)

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Court of Justice of the European Union has announced its dismissal of the appeals filed by five companies that had been fined for their participation in a cartel.

    On March 11, 2006, the Commission imposed fines totaling €32.76 million for particip ...

    By Jody Coultas, J.D.

    The Court of Justice of the European Union has announced its dismissal of the appeals filed by five companies that had been fined for their participation in a cartel.

    On March 11, 2006, the Commission imposed fines totaling €32.76 million for participating in a cartel on the international removal services market in Belgium. The cartel related to the direct or indirect fixing of prices, market sharing, and the manipulation of the procedures for the submission of tenders.

    The General Court upheld the Commission’s decision, but reduced the amount of the fine for Gosselin from €3.28 million to €2.32 million. Also, the General Court held that Gosselin’s parent foundation, Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje, did not constitute an undertaking for the purposes of competition law. Consequently, the General Court annulled the fine to be paid jointly and severally with Gosselin.

    The Court of Justice dismissed the companies’ appeals and the fines imposed on those companies were maintained. However, the Court of Justice set aside the judgment of the General Court in so far as it annulled the fine imposed on Portielje.

    The General Court erred in holding that a sanction could be imposed on Portielje only if, viewed in isolation, it could be classified as an undertaking for the purposes of competition law. Because Portielje exercised 100% control of Gosselin, the mere fact that Portielje did not make any formal management decision was not sufficient to rebut the presumption of the actual exercise of decisive influence on Gosselin.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use