Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Durbin Criticizes Administration’s Refusal to Testify Publicly About Surveillance Reform
    • Administration’s Actions Create Fraught Environment for Surveillance Law Debate, Groups Warn
    • D. Mass.: Genetic privacy class action over Nebula Genomics web tracking may proceed
    • EU Parliament Moves to Extend CSAM Detection Privacy Exemption
    • International Law Enforcement Operation Dismantles Botnet Used for Cyber Crime
    • Luxembourg Court Cancels $853M Privacy Fine Against Amazon
    • Minnesota Lawmakers Eye Social Media Safety Bill
    • New Zealand Issues Privacy Guidance for Education Sector
    • Privacy Legislation on Agenda for Alaska House
    • Recommendations for Biotech Law Offered by EU Privacy Authorities
    • South Korea Fines Credit Card Provider Over Data Breach
    • VoIP Provider Faces FCC Punishment Over Robocalls
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, VoIP Provider Faces FCC Punishment Over Robocalls, (Mar 13, 2026)

    By Lynn Stanton

    The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau has issued a final determination order and removal order against Belthrough LLC, finding that the company failed to comply with Commission rules regarding the transmission of illegal traffic and directing that all ...

    By Lynn Stanton

    The FCC’s Enforcement Bureau has issued a final determination order and removal order against Belthrough LLC, finding that the company failed to comply with Commission rules regarding the transmission of illegal traffic and directing that all providers immediately downstream from Belthrough begin blocking traffic from the company within 30 days.

    “Downstream providers may choose to initiate blocking sooner than 30 calendar days from the release of the Final Determination Order if, prior to initiating blocking, they provide the Commission with notice and a brief summary of the basis for their determination that the provider failed to effectively mitigate illegal traffic within 48 hours of being notified by the Commission or failed to implement effective measures to prevent new and renewing customers from using its network to originate illegal calls,” the bureau said, FCC, Final Determination Order and Removal Order, Dkt. 22-174 (March 12, 2026).

    The bureau also removed Belthrough’s certification from the FCC’s robocall mitigation database (RMD). That action triggers a mandate for all voice service providers and intermediate providers to cease accepting calls directly from Belthrough within two business days of today’s release of the removal order.

    Belthrough is not allowed to refile its RMD certification without the prior approval of the Enforcement and Wireline Competition bureaus.

    “Other than acknowledging receipt of the Notice, Belthrough took no action in response to either the Notice or the Initial Determination Order,” which are the earlier steps in the FCC’s mandatory call blocking framework established in its 2023 gateway provider order, the Enforcement Bureau noted.

    The bureau issued an initial determination order and order to show cause last month (CPR, Feb. 23) and a notification of suspected illegal traffic last year.

    News: FederalLegislation DataPrivacy LitigationEnforcement

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use