Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Durbin Criticizes Administration’s Refusal to Testify Publicly About Surveillance Reform
    • Administration’s Actions Create Fraught Environment for Surveillance Law Debate, Groups Warn
    • D. Mass.: Genetic privacy class action over Nebula Genomics web tracking may proceed
    • EU Parliament Moves to Extend CSAM Detection Privacy Exemption
    • International Law Enforcement Operation Dismantles Botnet Used for Cyber Crime
    • Luxembourg Court Cancels $853M Privacy Fine Against Amazon
    • Minnesota Lawmakers Eye Social Media Safety Bill
    • New Zealand Issues Privacy Guidance for Education Sector
    • Privacy Legislation on Agenda for Alaska House
    • Recommendations for Biotech Law Offered by EU Privacy Authorities
    • South Korea Fines Credit Card Provider Over Data Breach
    • VoIP Provider Faces FCC Punishment Over Robocalls
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Recommendations for Biotech Law Offered by EU Privacy Authorities, (Mar 13, 2026)

    By Tony Foley

    The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) issued a joint opinion yesterday on the European Commission’s proposal for enacting the European Biotech Act.

    The Biotech Act aims to strengthen Europe ...

    By Tony Foley

    The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) issued a joint opinion yesterday on the European Commission’s proposal for enacting the European Biotech Act.

    The Biotech Act aims to strengthen Europe’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors, particularly in the area of health, by streamlining the regulatory framework and updating the rules for clinical trials. The EDPB and EDPS expressed support for the proposal’s objective of fostering European Union competitiveness and addressing existing fragmentation in the application of clinical trials regulations. In particular, they welcome the goal of establishing a single legal basis for the processing of personal information by sponsors and investigators, which they said would significantly improve legal clarity across the EU.

    The opinion underlines that the sensitivity of health and genetic data processed in the context of clinical trials requires a high standard of protection. Specifically, the agencies made the following recommendations:

    1. Clarify controller rules to specify whether the actors involved in funding and conducting clinical trials act as joint controllers;

    2. Limit data retention by expressly applying the proposed 25-year retention period to the clinical trial master file rather than to all personal data processed during a trial;

    3. With respect to further processing for other trials or scientific research, since the proposed act aims to provide a legal basis for the further processing of trial data by the same controller, it should clearly define the purposes and specific safeguards for such processing;

    4. Ensure that obligations for sponsors complement the existing requirements under the EU AI Act to ensure a consistent regulatory environment;

    5. Include appropriate technical and organizational measures like requiring pseudonymization whenever the trial does not require the processing of directly identifiable personal data; and

    6. Specify that the implementing acts regarding sandboxes in the specific context of clinical trials should provide for a legal basis for processing of personal data, as well as the derogation under article 9(2) of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for the processing of sensitive personal data.

    “Europe’s ambition to lead in medical innovation must go hand in hand with trust,” EDPB Chair Anu Talus said in a press release. “Our opinion makes recommendations to the co-legislators aiming to ensure that the pursuit of new treatments respects the fundamental rights of individuals. This will help build a framework that protects clinical trial participants and will ensure further legal certainty for researchers.”

    “A competitive biotechnology sector in Europe requires a predictable and harmonised legal environment,” added European Data Protection Supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski. “We welcome the proposal’s move towards a single legal basis for clinical trials, which will facilitate GDPR compliance and strengthen consistency across the Union. However, this harmonisation must be accompanied by strong safeguards, including a clear definition of the roles and responsibilities of all actors involved to ensure trust and accountability in scientific research.”

    News: InternationalLegislation DataPrivacy DataSecurity GDPR

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use