Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Beyond Meat cuts $23.5M trademark damages verdict to $37,500 but disgorgement award stands
    • COPYRIGHT—3d Cir.: Dismissal of professor’s copyright suit over machine-learning course affirmed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • COPYRIGHT—N.D. Ill.: Attorneys’ fees awarded in full under Fogerty analysis after declaratory judgment of noninfringement
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Ill.: $17M Jury verdict survives challenge in display rack patent case involving Campbell’s Company
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—S.D.N.Y.: Trade secret, other claims tossed on summary judgment in financial software contract dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Birkenstock, White Mountain footwear intellectual property dispute will continue
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Birkenstock, White Mountain footwear intellectual property dispute will continue, (Sep 21, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Garett & Dunner, LLP | Meister Seelig & Schuster PLLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Birkenstock US BidCo, Inc. | White Mountain International, LLC

    By Sherri M. Schroeder, J.D.

    The court found that disputed facts as to whether White Mountain's sales were de minimis until 2018 prevented the court from determining whether the progressive encroachment doctrine defeated White Mountain's laches defense.

    The doctrines of laches an ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use