Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Beyond Meat cuts $23.5M trademark damages verdict to $37,500 but disgorgement award stands
    • COPYRIGHT—3d Cir.: Dismissal of professor’s copyright suit over machine-learning course affirmed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • COPYRIGHT—N.D. Ill.: Attorneys’ fees awarded in full under Fogerty analysis after declaratory judgment of noninfringement
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Ill.: $17M Jury verdict survives challenge in display rack patent case involving Campbell’s Company
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—S.D.N.Y.: Trade secret, other claims tossed on summary judgment in financial software contract dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Birkenstock, White Mountain footwear intellectual property dispute will continue
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT—N.D. Ill.: $17M Jury verdict survives challenge in display rack patent case involving Campbell’s Company, (Sep 21, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP | Martin Pavane & Associates
    Organizations Mentioned:Gamon Plus, Inc. | The Campbell's Co. f/k/a Campbell Soup Co.

    By Steven Melendez

    A judge denied a motion for judgment as a matter of law, finding the jury was presented with sufficient evidence to justify its ruling.

    A federal judge denied defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law challenging a roughly $17. ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use