Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—N.D. Ill.: Chicago Cubs can block rooftop business from selling tickets to watch Wrigley Field games
    • COPYRIGHT—3d Cir.: Startup’s copying of Westlaw headnotes for AI training was not fair use
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—E.D. Wis.: Beveled eyeglass lens patents invalidated for obviousness
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Ill.: General Motors barred from recovering pre-counterclaim damages in design patent dispute
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—C.D. Cal.: Snack-grabbing device trademark infringement claim scuttled on priority of use basis
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—M.D. Pa.: Settlement of trademark dispute held enforceable based on documented representations of counsel
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—S.D.N.Y.: NFL merchandise class action suit flagged for lack of standing
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—C.D. Cal.: Snack-grabbing device trademark infringement claim scuttled on priority of use basis, (Oct 1, 2026)

    By Joe Cox, J.D.

    Two competing chopstick-like potato chip grabbing devices battled, with the suit dismissed because of the defendant’s priority of use of the device.

    A federal district court in California has issued a ruling in a trademark infringement suit inv ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use