Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Md. Ct. App.: Disbarment proper sanction for attorney who pleaded guilty to bid rigging
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: District court’s reduction of award to Jimi Hendrix’s heir vacated
    • AGENCY NEWS: FTC announces new Public Affairs Director
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: ArcelorMittal acquisition of ThyssenKrupp Steel USA avoids U.S. antitrust review
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau provides submission to CRTC on wireless roaming rates
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: EC rejects another referral request from Germany, will continue review of telecom merger
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC approves Franchise Services of North America’s application to sell Advantage Rent a Car
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Japanese auto lighting equipment maker sentenced in price fixing probe
    • ANTITRUST—S.D. Fla. Litigant found to have standing despite failure to alleviate its injury
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC launches new complaint process for military members regarding higher education institutions
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—Ohio App. Ct.: Successor manufacturer Heineken did not violate Ohio alcoholic beverage law with termination
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D.N.Y.: Franchisor of Hampton Inns validly terminated hotel
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D. Mo.: Consumer’s claims against Restasis maker fail
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—E.D. Mo.: Dog food purchaser failed to state claims against manufacturer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY—Md. Ct. App.: Disbarment proper sanction for attorney who pleaded guilty to bid rigging, (Jan 30, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Shapiro, Sher, Guinot & Sandler
    Organizations Mentioned:Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Maryland’s highest court has disbarred an attorney who pleaded guilty in 2010 to conspiring to rig bids at tax lien auctions (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Nusbaum, January 29, 2014, Bell, J.).

    Harvey M. Nusbaum was indicted in 2 ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Maryland’s highest court has disbarred an attorney who pleaded guilty in 2010 to conspiring to rig bids at tax lien auctions (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Nusbaum, January 29, 2014, Bell, J.).

    Harvey M. Nusbaum was indicted in 2009, along with co-defendant Jack W. Stollof, on a charge of conspiring to rig bids at auctions for tax liens conducted by a Maryland municipality and various counties in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Nusbaum was charged with submitting the rigged bids through limited liability companies that he co-owned with Stollof. The conspiracy took place between 2002 and 2007, according to court documents.

    In May 2010, Nusbaum pleaded guilty. He was sentenced to 12 months and one day of imprisonment (of which he served more than 10 months) and two years of probation. In addition, he was ordered to pay a fine in the amount of $800,000. The judgment also provided for 100 hours of community service as a condition of probation.

    The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland petitioned for Nusbaum’s suspension from the practice of law. The petition was granted by a state circuit court, and now the state’s court of appeals has upheld that decision.

    Nusbaum admitted to the commission of a “serious crime,” justifying disbarment. The crime involved dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct. Moreover, he presented no evidence of any mitigating factors or extenuating circumstances, and he and his counsel “stood mute” at oral argument, offering no recommendation as to the appropriate sanction. Therefore, the petitioner’s recommendation was adopted and Nusbaum was disbarred.

    Attorneys: Raymond Hein for Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Mathew Esworthy (Shapiro, Sher, Guinot & Sandler) for Harvey Malcolm Nusbaum.

    MainStory: TopStory Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews MarylandNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use