Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Idaho, private plaintiffs seeking to recover millions in fees in acquisition challenge
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC releases fourth major study on alcohol advertising
    • ADVERTISING—3rd Cir.: False light claims barred by res judicata
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau’s draft price maintenance guidelines released for comment
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks comments on Service Corporation International’s application to sell funeral assets in Kansas, Missouri, and Texas
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Franken urges Justice Department to weigh open Internet issues in Comcast-TWC review
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC issues changes to Freedom of Information Act fee schedule
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Online business opportunities marketers settle FTC charges of work-at-home scheme
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: U.S. Supreme Court asked to review arbitration requirement for Magnuson-Moss warranty claim in action against rent-to-own operator
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ga.: Franchisor, affiliate could be covered joint enterprise within Fair Labor Standards Act
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Crowell, Proskauer add to antitrust teams
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Senate Commerce Committee to hold hearing on data security
    • RICO—N.D. Cal.: Nationwide class of lessees certified on reconsideration
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Consumer claims of evaporated cane juice in yogurt products have standing, allowed to continue
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Juice purchaser lacked standing to sue manufacturer over allegedly misbranded products
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—S.D. Ill.: Claims that consumers are limited to only large portions of eye drops survive attempts to dismiss
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—S.D. Ill.: Claims that eye drops are too large for consumer’s eyes continue
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY: Idaho, private plaintiffs seeking to recover millions in fees in acquisition challenge, (Mar 20, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. | Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Duke Scanlan & Hall, PLLC | Godfrey & Kahn, SC | Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn, LLP | Nampa, Inc. | Powers Tolman Farley, PLLC | Saint Alphonsus Medical Center— | Saltzer Medical Group, P.A. | St. Luke's Health System | St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd. | Treasure Valley Hospital Limited Partnership | Treasure Valley Hospital, LP

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The State of Idaho, Saint Alphonsus Health System, Inc., and Treasure Valley Hospital (TVH) are seeking to recover attorney fees and costs for their successful challenge to St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.’s acquisition of Saltzer Medical ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    The State of Idaho, Saint Alphonsus Health System, Inc., and Treasure Valley Hospital (TVH) are seeking to recover attorney fees and costs for their successful challenge to St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.’s acquisition of Saltzer Medical Group (St. Alphonsus Medical Center—Nampa, Inc. v. St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd., Case Nos. 1:12-cv-00560-BLW, 1:13-CV-00116-BLW).

    In January, the federal district court in Boise held that, with the help of the FTC, the state and these private plaintiffs proved that the 2012 acquisition by St. Luke’s—the largest health care system in Idaho—of Saltzer—the state’s largest independent, multi-specialty physician practice—violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Idaho Competition Act. The court permanently enjoined the acquisition and ordered St. Luke’s to fully divest Saltzer and its assets.

    Idaho is seeking attorney fees in the amount of $972,993, as well as taxable costs in the amount of $68,294, and total non-taxable costs in the amount of $45,103. The Clayton Act and the Idaho Competition Act provide for mandatory recovery of attorney fees and costs in connection with an action brought under that statute, according to the state’s memorandum supporting its fee request. The state argues that the fees for its own attorneys and for attorneys at Godfrey & Kahn are reasonable. Godfrey & Kahn voluntarily capped its hourly rate for attorneys involved in this case at $465, it was noted.

    Saint Alphonsus seeks $7,342,456 in attorney fees and $842,701 in non-taxable costs in the matter. In its motion, Saint Alphonsus contends that, in addition to substantially prevailing in the entire case, it substantially prevailed on a preliminary injunction request, even though its motion for preliminary injunction was denied. “Given the scope of the case, Saint Alphonsus’ attorneys conducted it in an extremely “efficient” fashion, avoiding duplication and conducting work at the lowest available rates,” according to the filing. The rates for attorneys from the two firms representing Saint Alphonsus ranged from $120 to $770.

    Private plaintiff Treasure Valley Hospital (TVH)—a nine-bed physician-owned, short-term care, non-emergency hospital in Boise—also claims in its filing that it is a prevailing plaintiff entitled to its attorney fees and costs. It seeks fees in the amount of $348,977. TVH also seeks an award of its non-taxable costs in the amount of $110,124. The attorneys for TVH spent over 1700 hours on the case. The fees for those attorneys range between $175 and $225 per hour.

    Yesterday, the court granted the defense request to bifurcate the attorney fee issues. It will consider first the issue regarding entitlement to fees. If entitlement is found, the parties will then provide briefing on the amount of the fees. The FTC is not seeking to recover attorney fees.

    Attorneys: Eric J. Wilson, Idaho Attorney General’s Office, and Kevin J. O’Connor (Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.) for State of Idaho. David A. Ettinger (Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP) and Keely E. Duke (Duke Scanlan & Hall, PLLC) for Saint Alphonsus Health System, Inc. Raymond D. Powers (Powers Tolman Farley, PLLC) for Treasure Valley Hospital.

    Companies: Saint Alphonsus Medical Center—Nampa, Inc.; Treasure Valley Hospital Limited Partnership; St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.; Saltzer Medical Group, P.A.

    MainStory: TopStory Antitrust IdahoNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use