Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Idaho, private plaintiffs seeking to recover millions in fees in acquisition challenge
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC releases fourth major study on alcohol advertising
    • ADVERTISING—3rd Cir.: False light claims barred by res judicata
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau’s draft price maintenance guidelines released for comment
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks comments on Service Corporation International’s application to sell funeral assets in Kansas, Missouri, and Texas
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Franken urges Justice Department to weigh open Internet issues in Comcast-TWC review
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC issues changes to Freedom of Information Act fee schedule
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Online business opportunities marketers settle FTC charges of work-at-home scheme
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: U.S. Supreme Court asked to review arbitration requirement for Magnuson-Moss warranty claim in action against rent-to-own operator
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ga.: Franchisor, affiliate could be covered joint enterprise within Fair Labor Standards Act
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Crowell, Proskauer add to antitrust teams
    • PRIVACY NEWS: Senate Commerce Committee to hold hearing on data security
    • RICO—N.D. Cal.: Nationwide class of lessees certified on reconsideration
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Consumer claims of evaporated cane juice in yogurt products have standing, allowed to continue
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Juice purchaser lacked standing to sue manufacturer over allegedly misbranded products
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—S.D. Ill.: Claims that consumers are limited to only large portions of eye drops survive attempts to dismiss
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—S.D. Ill.: Claims that eye drops are too large for consumer’s eyes continue
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Franken urges Justice Department to weigh open Internet issues in Comcast-TWC review, (Mar 20, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Comcast Corp. | Comcast Corporation | Time Warner Cable, Inc.

    By Lynn Stanton,TR Daily

    Sen. Al Franken (D., Minn.) is urging the Department of Justice Antitrust Division to take into account the potential effect of Comcast Corp.’s proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable, Inc., on “the open nature of the Internet” ...

    By Lynn Stanton,TR Daily

    Sen. Al Franken (D., Minn.) is urging the Department of Justice Antitrust Division to take into account the potential effect of Comcast Corp.’s proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable, Inc., on “the open nature of the Internet” as the agency conducts its premerger review of the proposed transaction.

    “I am very concerned that Comcast could use its clout in the broadband market to dictate the content consumers receive and the prices they pay, and these concerns are only intensified by Comcast’s proposal to acquire Time Warner Cable,” Franken said in a March 19 letter to Antitrust Division officials. “With more than 20 million customers, Comcast already is the nation’s dominant Internet service provider, controlling about a quarter of the national broadband market and a much higher percentage of the market in many of the local areas in which it operates. By acquiring Time Warner Cable, Comcast would extend its reach substantially, covering millions of additional customers. This would give Comcast even more leverage to manipulate Internet traffic to serve its own corporate interests.”

    Franken said that the open Internet or net neutrality obligations that Comcast accepted to gain regulatory approval of its 2011 NBC Universal joint venture expire in 2018, “which raises the question of what happens after that time.” He added that “the FCC’s net neutrality conditions do not extend to peering arrangements.”

    Comcast Vice President-government communications Sena Fitzmaurice responded to the senator’s action by saying, “The Comcast Time Warner Cable transaction will bring millions more Americans under the open Internet rules as soon as our deal closes. We fully expect that the FCC will have in place open Internet rules that will apply to all companies by the time our current condition from the NBCUniversal deal expires in 2018. That condition was always meant as a bridge to enforceable rules that would be applicable to all companies in the industry. Comcast has supported the Open Internet rules since they were first proposed and is the only company that is currently required to abide by them.”

    Companies: Comcast Corp.; Time Warner Cable, Inc.

    News: Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use